New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Tumor Time Bombs Set Off by Stem Cells

Deadly call and response recruits stem cells to nourish ticking tumors

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Researchers say they have identified a switch that makes dormant breast cancer cells that have traveled to the lungs swell to lethal proportions—completing the dreaded process of metastasis or cancer spread. A team from Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory in Long Island, N.Y., reports that it staved off full-blown metastasis in mice by preventing mini-tumors in the lungs from recruiting stem cells called endothelial progenitors, which assemble into blood vessels to nourish the malignancy.

Researchers do not know if the same thing would work for other types of cancer or cancer cells lodged in other body organs. Still, they hope to discover drugs that could put the brakes on at least some metastases by short-circuiting the ability of endothelial progenitors to respond to chemical cues sent out by tumors.

As tumors grow and develop, they shed micro-metastases, clusters of a few cells that take up residence in far-flung organs such as the brain, liver and bone. Without new vessels to bring them fresh nutrient-rich blood, however, they may lay dormant for years before suddenly sprouting into macro-metastases large enough to damage organs and cause death.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


"They're sleeping and suddenly they wake up, and that's very dangerous," says Cold Spring cancer biologist Vivek Mittal. Metastatic cancer is rarely curable.

To explain the so-called angiogenic switch, or sudden growth of new blood vessels, some have pointed to endothelial progenitors, which live in bone marrow but are found in more than half of all solid tumor types, says hematology oncologist Shahin Rafii of Weill Cornell Medical College in New York City. Their significance wasn't clear, though, given that they only account for 12 to 15 percent of a tumor's blood vessels.

To clarify their role, the Cold Spring group allowed breast tumors implanted in mice to form  micro-metastases in the lungs. The team then introduced short RNA molecules that deactivate a gene called Id1, which promotes angiogenesis and is active in endothelial progenitors.

Treated mice formed fewer tumors and showed less angiogenesis, and half survived to day 40, whereas all untreated mice died within 30 days, the group reports in Science. The treated mice also showed a 96 percent reduction in the flow of endothelial progenitors from bone marrow to lung.

"It's very novel," says Rafii, who was not involved in the study. "You shut off 12 percent of cells, and 50 percent of the mice survive much longer."

He says that the mechanism is unlikely to work in all tumor types or metastases, but that it is definitely worth exploring its potential ability to turn some fatal cancers into chronic diseases. "At least in mouse systems it works, so it has to be tested in humans eventually."

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe