Tumor Time Bombs Set Off by Stem Cells

Deadly call and response recruits stem cells to nourish ticking tumors

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Researchers say they have identified a switch that makes dormant breast cancer cells that have traveled to the lungs swell to lethal proportions—completing the dreaded process of metastasis or cancer spread. A team from Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory in Long Island, N.Y., reports that it staved off full-blown metastasis in mice by preventing mini-tumors in the lungs from recruiting stem cells called endothelial progenitors, which assemble into blood vessels to nourish the malignancy.

Researchers do not know if the same thing would work for other types of cancer or cancer cells lodged in other body organs. Still, they hope to discover drugs that could put the brakes on at least some metastases by short-circuiting the ability of endothelial progenitors to respond to chemical cues sent out by tumors.

As tumors grow and develop, they shed micro-metastases, clusters of a few cells that take up residence in far-flung organs such as the brain, liver and bone. Without new vessels to bring them fresh nutrient-rich blood, however, they may lay dormant for years before suddenly sprouting into macro-metastases large enough to damage organs and cause death.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


"They're sleeping and suddenly they wake up, and that's very dangerous," says Cold Spring cancer biologist Vivek Mittal. Metastatic cancer is rarely curable.

To explain the so-called angiogenic switch, or sudden growth of new blood vessels, some have pointed to endothelial progenitors, which live in bone marrow but are found in more than half of all solid tumor types, says hematology oncologist Shahin Rafii of Weill Cornell Medical College in New York City. Their significance wasn't clear, though, given that they only account for 12 to 15 percent of a tumor's blood vessels.

To clarify their role, the Cold Spring group allowed breast tumors implanted in mice to form  micro-metastases in the lungs. The team then introduced short RNA molecules that deactivate a gene called Id1, which promotes angiogenesis and is active in endothelial progenitors.

Treated mice formed fewer tumors and showed less angiogenesis, and half survived to day 40, whereas all untreated mice died within 30 days, the group reports in Science. The treated mice also showed a 96 percent reduction in the flow of endothelial progenitors from bone marrow to lung.

"It's very novel," says Rafii, who was not involved in the study. "You shut off 12 percent of cells, and 50 percent of the mice survive much longer."

He says that the mechanism is unlikely to work in all tumor types or metastases, but that it is definitely worth exploring its potential ability to turn some fatal cancers into chronic diseases. "At least in mouse systems it works, so it has to be tested in humans eventually."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe