New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Turning Leaves into Petals

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Image: SORAYA PELAZ, UCSD

Through a remarkable sleight of gene, scientists at the University of California at San Diego and the National Autonomous University of Mexico have tricked leaves into forming petals instead. In practice, the results mean that you might soon be able to buy roses sporting soft petals all the way up the stem.

"This is a very exciting discovery," says Martin F. Yanofsky of UCSD. "We've known for a decade how to convert the flower organs into leaves, but we haven't been able to convert leaves into flower organs. We knew that we were missing a piece of the puzzle, and now we know exactly what we were missing."


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


A typical flower consists of four rings, or whorls. The outer whorl is made up of sepals, which surround a bud before it opens; next comes a ring of petals; inside the petals are the stamens, the male reproductive organs; and in the very center are carpels, or female parts. More than 200 years ago, biologists first suggested that the whorls were, in essence, modified leaves. But no one could figure out how to isolate the genes involved.

Last May, Yanofsky and his colleagues discovered a trio of genes that, when modified together, produced so-called double flowers¿blooms in which the petals, stamens and carpels all became sepals. Building on that work, they have now found that modifying two of these SEP genes in concert with three other flower development genes makes leaves turn into petals. In the image above, the Arabidopsis plant on the left has four of these five genes switched on; all five genes are expressed in the plant on the right.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe