Two Decades of Satellite Data Show the Northern Hemisphere is Getting Greener

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Image: NASA

It's not your imagination. Spring is arriving earlier and fall, somewhat later¿at least if you live above 40 degrees north latitude, the line that intersects New York, Madrid and Bejing. A recent analysis of two decades of satellite data confirms that the growing season in the northern hemisphere is getting longer and plant life is becoming more lush as well. Scientists from Boston University and NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center will publish the study in the September 16th issue of Geophysical Research Letters.

The scientists believe the change may stem from rising greenhouse gases in the atmosphere and resulting higher temperatures. "When we looked at temperature and satellite vegetation data, we saw that year-to-year changes in growth and duration of the growing season of northern vegetation are tightly linked to year-to-year changes in temperature," Liming Zhou of Boston University says. For temperature records, the team used the Global Historical Climate Network, developed by Goddard researcher James Hansen using data from several thousand meteorological stations around the world.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Of interest, the satellite pictures revealed a difference between Northern America and Eurasia: the greening trend is more pronounced to the east, particularly throughout the forests and woodlands in central Europe, Siberia and far-east Russia (see image). In the U.S., the most dramatic changes appeared in the eastern forests and grasslands of the upper midwest. In keeping, the researchers found that since 1982 the growing season in Eurasia has gained nearly 18 days, whereas it has extended by only 12 days in the U.S..

"This is an important finding because of possible implications to the global carbon cycle," Ranga Myneni of Boston University notes. "However, more research is needed to determine how much carbon is being absorbed, and how much longer it will continue."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe