Two Dozen Cloned Cows Get Clean Bill of Health

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Some one to four years after birth, 24 cloned cows appear normal and healthy, scientists say. The findings, which will be published in the November 30 issue of the journal Science, stand in contrast to earlier reports of genetic, immunological and developmental defects in cloned animals. According to researchers involved in the work, the results demonstrate that cattle producers should be able to use their cloning technology to safely replicate their best animals. Moreover, they affirm the potential of cloning for medicine.

Investigators led by Robert P. Lanza of Advanced Cell Technology in Worcester, Mass., implanted 496 cloned embryos into 247 cows. Some 35 to 40 days after the transfer, 45 percent of the cows were shown to be pregnant. Only 30 of the clones developed to term, but of these 24 survived to adulthood and have passed the full spectrum of health tests with flying colors. This 80 percent success rate among the cloned cows approaches that of normal rates of survival from birth to adulthood, which range from 84 to 87 percent. The team further notes that the animals seem behaviorally and reproductively normal. In fact, two of the cloned animals have given birth to their own calves, which themselves appear normal in every way.

"Several of the cloned calves experienced pulmonary hypertension and respiratory distress at birth, and fever after vaccinations at four months," the researchers write. "However, we did not observe genetic defects, immune deficiencies, gross obesity or other drastic abnormalities cited by other researchers." Whether these previously reported defects occur in other species or stem from differences in cloning techniques¿or some combination of the two¿they conclude, remains to be determined.

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she has focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe