Two Sides of the Same Coin: Gym-bots and Obese People May Share the Same Brain Pathway

A single DNA variation may contribute to both exercise addiction and obesity

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The runner tethered to the treadmill and the couch potato gripping a bag of chips may seem like polar opposites, but new research suggests that a single alteration in the brain’s reward system could cause both obsessions.

More than one third of regular gym-goers show signs of exercise depen­dence, continuing to exercise even when sick or injured or arranging their lives around working out. Nearly half of all people diagnosed with an eating disorder report excessive levels of exercise to control body shape and weight and to relieve stress and improve mood. Researchers have developed two opposing hypotheses to explain how someone could become addicted to exercise, eating or any other behavior. The first hypothesis states that these people’s brains grow more sensitive to reward; they find exercise more plea­surable, so they seek it more. Alter­natively, these individuals may grow less sensitive to reward; over time they begin to require more exercise to achieve the same level of pleasure.

A new study, led by Wendy Mathes of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, found that two strains of mice, bred for either excessive exercise or obesity, had the same malfunction in the brain’s reward pathways. Genetic analysis of the two kinds of mice showed that they had lower-than-normal levels of activity in a gene that helps brain cells register the presence of dopamine, the neurotransmitter involved in reward. The finding suggests that excessively exercising mice and obese mice may be less sensitive to the rewards of physical activity and food, respectively. Researchers do not know yet how the same underlying problem could lead to such radically different outcomes, but Mathes suggests that other neurotransmitters may act on the dopamine-deprived brain cells to push the mice in one direction or the other.

Carrie Arnold is an independent public health journalist in Virginia.

More by Carrie Arnold
SA Mind Vol 21 Issue 3This article was published with the title “Two Sides of the Same Coin: Gym-bots and Obese People May Share the Same Brain Pathway” in SA Mind Vol. 21 No. 3 (), p. 8
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind0710-8b

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe