New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Two Sides of the Same Coin: Gym-bots and Obese People May Share the Same Brain Pathway

A single DNA variation may contribute to both exercise addiction and obesity

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The runner tethered to the treadmill and the couch potato gripping a bag of chips may seem like polar opposites, but new research suggests that a single alteration in the brain’s reward system could cause both obsessions.

More than one third of regular gym-goers show signs of exercise depen­dence, continuing to exercise even when sick or injured or arranging their lives around working out. Nearly half of all people diagnosed with an eating disorder report excessive levels of exercise to control body shape and weight and to relieve stress and improve mood. Researchers have developed two opposing hypotheses to explain how someone could become addicted to exercise, eating or any other behavior. The first hypothesis states that these people’s brains grow more sensitive to reward; they find exercise more plea­surable, so they seek it more. Alter­natively, these individuals may grow less sensitive to reward; over time they begin to require more exercise to achieve the same level of pleasure.

A new study, led by Wendy Mathes of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, found that two strains of mice, bred for either excessive exercise or obesity, had the same malfunction in the brain’s reward pathways. Genetic analysis of the two kinds of mice showed that they had lower-than-normal levels of activity in a gene that helps brain cells register the presence of dopamine, the neurotransmitter involved in reward. The finding suggests that excessively exercising mice and obese mice may be less sensitive to the rewards of physical activity and food, respectively. Researchers do not know yet how the same underlying problem could lead to such radically different outcomes, but Mathes suggests that other neurotransmitters may act on the dopamine-deprived brain cells to push the mice in one direction or the other.

Carrie Arnold is an independent public health journalist in Virginia.

More by Carrie Arnold
SA Mind Vol 21 Issue 3This article was published with the title “Two Sides of the Same Coin: Gym-bots and Obese People May Share the Same Brain Pathway” in SA Mind Vol. 21 No. 3 (), p. 8
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind0710-8b

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe