New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

U.S. Deaths Drop for Leading Causes

Fatalities from causes like heart disease, cancer and stroke dropped 43 percent between 1969 and 2013

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

By Lisa Rapaport

NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - The U.S. death rate for all causes is continuing to decline, aided by drops in fatalities from leading causes like heart disease, cancer, stroke, diabetes, and accidents, new research finds.

Between 1969 and 2013, the death rate for all causes declined 43% from 1,279/100,000 to 730/100,000, according to the study published in JAMA October 27.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Five of the six leading causes of death declined during the study period. Death rates dropped 77% for stroke, 68% for heart disease, 40% for unintended injuries, 18% for cancer, and 17% for diabetes.

"The leading causes of death examined in this study - except unintentional injuries - all are chronic conditions," lead author Dr. Jiemin Ma, director of the surveillance and health services research program at the American Cancer Society, told Reuters Health by email.

"Tobacco control, high blood pressure prevention and management, early detection and screening, and improvements in treating heart disease, and some types of cancer have substantially contributed to reductions in death rates," Dr. Ma added.

Only one of the six leading causes of death - chronic obstructive pulmonary disease - didn't drop. Rates of death from COPD doubled despite a decline in deaths among men near the end of the study period.

To examine long-term trends in mortality, Dr. Ma and colleagues analyzed U.S. national vital statistics to determine the total and annual percent change in age-standardized death rates and years of life lost before age 75 for all causes combined and for the leading causes.

While death rates for five of the six leading causes dropped, the magnitude of the declines recently started to slow for heart disease, stroke, and diabetes, the study found.

The progress against heart disease and stroke is due to improvements in controlling high blood pressure and cholesterol, smoking cessation, and advances in treatment, the authors conclude.

Reductions in cancer deaths since the early 1990s is also due to tobacco control efforts as well as gains in early detection and treatment, the authors note.

One limitation of the study is its reliance on death certificates to indicate disease-specific trends, the authors acknowledge. This data tends to be more accurate for cancer and injuries, but under-report deaths from COPD, stroke, and diabetes and over-report deaths from heart disease.

In addition, the focus on death rates is no longer a sufficient measure of the quality of care delivered in the U.S., wrote Dr. Michael McGinnis, of the National Academy of Medicine in Washington, D.C., in an editorial.

Earlier this year, a report from the Institute of Medicine recommended that the performance of the healthcare system be measured based on four domains - healthy people, quality care, affordable care, and engaged patients, Dr. McGinnis noted.

"Looking only at death rates, and primarily at mortality prominent in 1969, gives a necessary but not sufficient profile of the health of the nation and the citizens within it - missing issues like the rapid ascendance of Alzheimer's disease, the rise and reduction of HIV/AIDS, the more recent ascendance of diabetes deaths (tracking the obesity epidemic) and persistent disparities in health care, for example the sustained gap between blacks and whites," Dr. McGinnis told Reuters Health by email.

"We now have the science and the capacity to develop a system of vital signs that can give a much better picture of our health progress," Dr. McGinnis added.

-

The American Cancer Society funded this research. The authors reported no disclosures.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe