Ubiquitous Chemical Associated with Abnormal Human Reproductive Development

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Researchers have identified a link between exposure in the womb to widely used chemicals known as phthalates and adverse effects on genital development in male babies, according to a new report. Previous toxilogical studies had suggested that fetal exposure to the chemicals can affect reproductive development in rodents, but the new results indicate that developing humans could be vulnerable as well.

Phthalates are common components of items ranging from plastics to paints to personal care products such as nail polish and shampoo. In the first study of prenatal exposure to phthalates in humans, Shanna H. Swan of the University of Rochester and her colleagues studied 85 mother-son pairs. Prior to giving birth, the mothers supplied urine samples, which were analyzed for the presence and quantity of nine phthalate metabolites. The doctors also examined the children, who were between the ages of two and 30 months, for genital characteristics used as markers of normal sexual development.

When the researchers correlated the results with the mothers' level of exposure, they found that higher levels of four metabolites in their urine were correlated with a higher-than-expected number of changes to genital development in the baby boys. These changes include smaller scrotum and penis size and a smaller measurement known as the anogenital distance (AGD). None of the children were grossly abnormal, however, and the scientists detected no complete malformations or definite markers of disease. The results are consistent with the findings of animal studies, the authors note, but they caution that the use of AGD as a marker of sexual development in people is relatively new. Nevertheless, they conclude that the findings "support the hypothesis that prenatal phthalate exposure at environmental levels can adversely affect male reproductive development in humans." A report detailing the study will be published in an upcoming issue of the journal Environmental Health Perspectives.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe