Ultrasharp Video Cameras Record Motions of Nanoparticles

Electron microscope resolution for quick-and-dirty industrial applications

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Electron microscopes with nanometer resolution are widely used, but they cost millions of dollars, and preparing a sample for viewing is painstaking. This state of affairs is fine for the lab but impractical for industrial applications—say, for rapidly scanning product samples to look for embedded microscopic watermarks.

A new form of holographic microscopy developed by David Grier, a physicist at New York University, and his colleagues could provide a solution. They started with an off-the-shelf Zeiss microscope and replaced its incandescent light source with a laser. The laser shines on a sample of the material under study; light scatters off the sample and creates a two-dimensional pattern of interference between the laser beam and the scattered light—a hologram—which a video camera records.

Scientists have been making holograms of microscopic objects for decades, but it has always been hard to extract useful information from them. This is where Grier's invention adds value. His team wrote software capable of quickly solving the equations that describe how light scatters off a spherical object; by finding the values of certain terms buried in those equations, the software gathers information about the object that is causing that scattering. The microscope's nanometer resolution will allow researchers to track particles floating in colloidal solutions (for example, nanoscale beads floating in a sample of paint) using equipment that is at least a tenth of the cost of an electron microscope.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Grier hopes his device will provide the first rapid, affordable way to glimpse the individual particles at the heart of modern products. Imagine a paint bucket or shampoo bottle in which every drop contains particles that have been encoded with the product's manufacturing history—how it was made, in what factory and when, “sort of like a fingerprint,” Grier says. He adds that the microscope could just as easily read a molecular message stamped into medicine, explosives or other goods.

MORE TO EXPLORE

A Vector-Free Microfluidic Platform for Intracellular Delivery. Armon Sharei et al. in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, Vol. 110, No. 6, pages 2082–2087; February 5, 2013. http://www.pnas.org/content/110/6/2082.full

Fast Feature Identification for Holographic Tracking: The Orientation Alignment Transform. Bhaskar Jyoti Krishnatreya and David G. Grier in Optics Express, Vol. 22, No. 11, pages 12,773–12,778; June 2, 2014.

Eyeglasses-Free Display: Towards Correcting Visual Aberrations with Computational Light Field Displays. Fu-Chung Huang et al. in ACM Transactions on Graphics, Vol. 33, No. 4, Article No. 59; July 2014.

From our Archives

World Changing Ideas. December 2013.

Ben Fogelson is a AAAS Mass Media Fellow writing about science at Scientific American this summer. He's working on a Ph.D. in applied mathematics at the University of California, Davis.

More by Ben Fogelson
Scientific American Magazine Vol 311 Issue 6This article was published with the title “Video Cameras for Nanoparticles” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 311 No. 6 (), p. 53
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1214-53b

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe