An Ultrafast Camera Captures Very Early Cancer

An ultrafast camera may help detect cancer before it spreads

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Cancer cells that break away from a tumor and metastasize lead to 90 percent of all cancer deaths. Researchers have spent decades trying to develop blood tests that can effectively detect these circulating tumor cells. Finding them, however, can be like searching for a particular needle in a stack of needles. One milliliter of blood contains about five billion red blood cells and nearly 10 million white blood cells but only 10 tumor cells.

Researchers at the University of California, Los Angeles, have developed specialized technology that may be able to find these cells before they form new tumors, significantly boosting a patient's odds of survival. They describe the system in a July issue of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA.

At the heart of the U.C.L.A. system is an ultrafast microscopic camera the researchers introduced in 2009 that captures images at about six million frames per second. This so-called serial time-encoded amplified microscopy (STEAM) camera creates each image using a very short laser pulse—a flash of light only a billionth of a second long. Its shutter speed is 27 picoseconds, about a million times faster than a current digital camera. (A picosecond is one trillionth of a second.)


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The U.C.L.A. camera converts each laser pulse into a data stream from which a high-speed image can be assembled. To the STEAM camera, the investigators have added a microfluidic channel for the cells to flow through and a high-speed image processor that, they say, takes blur-free images. The team used this technology to identify breast cancer cells in blood samples. “We look at a cell's shape, size and texture, as well as its surface biochemistry,” explains lead author Keisuke Goda, who recently moved from U.C.L.A. to the University of Tokyo. “Cancer cells tend to be larger than white or red blood cells. And we know that a cancer cell's shape is ill defined compared with red and white blood cells.” Goda adds that a relatively noninvasive blood test would encourage people to get screened more frequently than they do now.

COMMENT ATScientificAmerican.com/oct2012

Larry Greenemeier is the associate editor of technology for Scientific American, covering a variety of tech-related topics, including biotech, computers, military tech, nanotech and robots.

More by Larry Greenemeier
Scientific American Magazine Vol 307 Issue 4This article was published with the title “Snap Judgment” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 307 No. 4 (), p. 18
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1012-18a

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe