Un-Killing the Messenger

P-Bodies do more than serve as RNA trash bins in cells

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

For a cell to make proteins, the nucleus first has to issue instructions. Once these genetic memos outlive their usefulness, they end up deactivated in repositories known as processing bodies. Research now suggests that these P-bodies are less like junkyards and more like office centers, where messages are amassed, silenced and reactivated.

Messenger RNA, or mRNA, relays instructions archived in DNA to ribosomes, where it gets translated into proteins. Expunging outdated mRNAs is necessary, lest they interfere with newer orders, explains Roy Parker of the University of Arizona. In 2003 he and his team discovered that after they tagged six mRNA demolition enzymes with fluorescent proteins, the enzymes all concentrated at the same points in yeast cells. Messenger RNAs that had been artificially made indigestible snarled at these spots, confirming that these P-bodies are where mRNAs go to die.

Early on, scientists suspected that P-bodies might play added roles, performing functions more complex than that of paper shredder. For instance, one RNA degrading protein found in yeast P-bodies, Dhh1p, was known for years as a key ingredient in granules in animal egg cells. These granules store mRNA from mothers to help generate proteins and drive much of the development in the early embryo. Neurons have mRNA storage granules as well, which are critical to memory formation. These granules, located near the synapses, release mRNA to make proteins that strengthen synapse connections.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


In the past several months, Parker's experiments have confirmed suspicions about the handy nature of P-bodies. The organelles can, for instance, stockpile and deploy mRNA to make proteins. In the September 1, 2005, Science, Parker and his colleagues report that depriving yeast of glucose cut down protein manufacture, resulting in reduced numbers of ribosome complexes known as polysomes and increased mRNA delivery to P-bodies. But instead of simply being destroyed, mRNAs accumulated. When glucose was restored, the number of polysomes rose, and the mRNAs disappeared, indicating that they were reactivated.

In mammals, P-bodies "are clearly more complex," Parker says. He and his collaborators discovered that mammalian P-bodies concentrate Argonaute proteins 1 and 2, critical ingredients underlying the mechanism of RNA interference, by which cells employ small RNA sequences that inhibit or destroy specific mRNAs to modify their own behavior or defend against viral invasions. Nearly a third of the human genome may be regulated by RNA interference, explains molecular biologist John Rossi of the Beckman Research Institute of the City of Hope in Duarte, Calif., and the two teams' studies "show that P-bodies must be important to RNA interference."

The primordial role of P-bodies could be regulating translation by holding and releasing mRNAs. "Reusing old molecules is faster and more efficient than generating new ones," Rossi points out. Parker believes P-bodies' role as messenger shredder may have developed later, when cells might have found it beneficial to break down older mRNAs.

Much remains unknown about the mechanics of P-bodies and the range of biological processes they might influence. With his colleagues, Parker says he is developing a model in which P-bodies are the ancestors of many of the other mRNA storage granules "as a fundamental part of how cells control their genes."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe