New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Uncovering the Secrets of Flycatcher Eyes

A never before seen collection of structures in the birds’ retinas may help them track speedy prey

Oil droplets surround a large mitochondrion in an Acadian flycatcher eye.

“A Novel Cellular Structure in the Photoreceptors of Insectivorous Birds,” by Luke P. Tyrrell et al. Preprint posted at bioRxiv on February 15, 2019

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Rather than chasing their prey in flight like many other birds, Acadian flycatchers prefer to ambush insects from a perch. Researchers recently discovered an odd structure in the birds' eyes that may help them track a moving insect while sitting still themselves.

Visual ecologist Luke P. Tyrrell of the State University of New York Plattsburgh and his colleagues found that the photoreceptors, or light-sensitive cells, at the center of the flycatcher's retina contain extralarge mitochondria. These components (which produce energy for cells) are each surrounded by hundreds of oil droplets, forming an elongated blob. Scientists have previously observed large mitochondria in the eyes of zebra fish and tree shrews, and many birds' photoreceptors contain oil droplets for modifying light. But biologists had never before observed an optical arrangement like the flycatcher's.

The structure “comes as a bit of a shock,” says Joseph Corbo, a visual scientist at Washington University in St. Louis, who was not involved in the study. “It's just out of the blue. There's nothing in any species, bird or otherwise, that has this distinctive sort of rocket-ship shape.”


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Some other birds' photoreceptors contain oil droplets—but usually just a single large one, Tyrrell notes. In the flycatcher's case, “there are hundreds or thousands of them, and they're super tiny and packed around these mitochondria, which is also very abnormal,” he says. “Almost like packing peanuts.” Tyrrell posted the study on the preprint server bioRxiv in February and has since submitted it to peer-reviewed journals.

The oil droplets filter out shorter wavelengths of light, allowing only longer ones (oranges and reds) to pass through. The researchers think these wavelengths might prompt certain enzymes in the mitochondria to produce more energy for the retinal cell, as researchers have previously demonstrated with mice, Tyrrell says. “That energy could be used for the cell to fire more times per second,” he explains. “It's like a higher frame rate on a camera.” He says this might allow the flycatcher to track fast-moving prey more effectively.

Corbo urges caution in speculating about the structure's energy-boosting role, noting that if such a specialized adaptation exists for that reason, it would likely be more widespread among bird species. He is not sure what function it might have beyond filtering and funneling the different wavelengths of light for some other purpose. “I would guess this is [just] a kind of fancy, modified oil droplet,” he says. Tyrrell and his colleagues found the retinal structure in the least flycatcher as well. He is now investigating whether birds closely related to these flycatchers have similar structures.*

*Editor’s Note (9/24/19): This paragraph was edited after posting to clarify that the structure was also found in the least flycatcher.

Jim Daley is a freelance journalist from Chicago. He writes about science and health.

More by Jim Daley
Scientific American Magazine Vol 321 Issue 2This article was published with the title “Eye of the Flycatcher” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 321 No. 2 (), p. 21
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0819-21

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe