Understanding Baby Talk

New studies reveal the universal nature of the singsong way we talk to infants

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Nearly everyone who bends over the crib of a baby bursts into bubbling, musical tones to try to get the infant's attention. This baby talk, or “motherese,” is widely considered to be a universal feature of human language, but now scientists report that a similar phenomenon might exist in other species—a finding that could help explain baby talk's evolution.

Rhesus monkeys use special vocalizations called grunts and girneys when they are around infants, but most researchers had believed the monkeys were directing the sounds at the mothers holding the babies. Now University of Chicago biologists Dario Maestripieri and Jessica Whitham have shown in a careful observational study that the monkeys were aiming the soft, nasal sounds at the infants. The vocalizations, Maestripieri says, are probably intended to get the newborn's attention and facilitate social interactions among group members—some of the same functions baby talk is thought to serve in people.

This monkey version of baby talk lends support to the popular theory that motherese helps humans build connections with their infants by attracting and holding the babies’ attention. Some researchers believe that the interest babies show in motherese could aid language development, and a few linguists take the idea a step further, suggesting that the extended vowels and exaggerated tones of motherese could teach infants basic grammar. Others contend, however, that the melodic sounds may have a simpler purpose—to facilitate comprehension.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


This hypothesis is supported by another new study, which showed that motherese can convey meaning between people who do not speak the same language. Cognitive psychologist Greg Bryant of the University of California, Los Angeles, found that the Shuar people of South America, who do not speak or understand English, were able to get the gist of North American mothers’ utterances 75 percent of the time when the women spoke as if they were addressing a newborn. This cross-cultural comprehension of motherese suggests that its basic characteristics appeared early in human history—and that it may have originated for the same socially beneficial reasons that led our monkey relatives to develop their own form of baby talk.

SA Mind Vol 18 Issue 6This article was published with the title “Understanding Baby Talk” in SA Mind Vol. 18 No. 6 (), p. 10
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind1207-10a

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe