New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Understanding Baby Talk

New studies reveal the universal nature of the singsong way we talk to infants

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Nearly everyone who bends over the crib of a baby bursts into bubbling, musical tones to try to get the infant's attention. This baby talk, or “motherese,” is widely considered to be a universal feature of human language, but now scientists report that a similar phenomenon might exist in other species—a finding that could help explain baby talk's evolution.

Rhesus monkeys use special vocalizations called grunts and girneys when they are around infants, but most researchers had believed the monkeys were directing the sounds at the mothers holding the babies. Now University of Chicago biologists Dario Maestripieri and Jessica Whitham have shown in a careful observational study that the monkeys were aiming the soft, nasal sounds at the infants. The vocalizations, Maestripieri says, are probably intended to get the newborn's attention and facilitate social interactions among group members—some of the same functions baby talk is thought to serve in people.

This monkey version of baby talk lends support to the popular theory that motherese helps humans build connections with their infants by attracting and holding the babies’ attention. Some researchers believe that the interest babies show in motherese could aid language development, and a few linguists take the idea a step further, suggesting that the extended vowels and exaggerated tones of motherese could teach infants basic grammar. Others contend, however, that the melodic sounds may have a simpler purpose—to facilitate comprehension.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


This hypothesis is supported by another new study, which showed that motherese can convey meaning between people who do not speak the same language. Cognitive psychologist Greg Bryant of the University of California, Los Angeles, found that the Shuar people of South America, who do not speak or understand English, were able to get the gist of North American mothers’ utterances 75 percent of the time when the women spoke as if they were addressing a newborn. This cross-cultural comprehension of motherese suggests that its basic characteristics appeared early in human history—and that it may have originated for the same socially beneficial reasons that led our monkey relatives to develop their own form of baby talk.

SA Mind Vol 18 Issue 6This article was published with the title “Understanding Baby Talk” in SA Mind Vol. 18 No. 6 (), p. 10
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind1207-10a

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe