UNICEF Aims to Eliminate HIV Infections in Infants by 2015 [Slide Show]

Is it possible? The United Nations agency thinks so. To see why, follow an HIV-positive mom and her baby as they go through an 18-month HIV-transmission prevention program

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Every day more than 1,000 infants worldwide are infected with HIV during gestation, delivery or breast-feeding, according to U.N. estimates. But the United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) says it will eliminate the transmission of HIV from mothers to their babies in just four years. It's an ambitious goal that the fund is unlikely to meet without major changes, but it's not impossible.

"What it doesn't require is a new scientific breakthrough," says Jimmy Kolker, chief of UNICEF's HIV/AIDS Programme. Mother-to-child HIV transmission virtually never happens in developed nations, where babies and moms have easier access to a prophylactic regimen of antiretroviral drugs. Medically, protecting infants from HIV infection means "just doing what we're already doing" in developed nations, such as giving moms a combination antiretroviral drug treatment during pregnancy and babies a dose of the drug nevirapine immediately after birth. For women who do not have access to clean, safe water to mix infant formula, it also means continuing antiretroviral treatments for moms and babies during breast-feeding.

The challenge now is to bring these drugs, which have been available since the late 1990s and have since undergone several revisions and improvements, to middle- and low-income countries. "The problems are logistical," says Laurie Garrett, a global health researcher at the Council on Foreign Relations.

This slide show explores what is needed to stop mother-to-child HIV transmission by 2015, following Inonge Siamalambo and her baby Elson of Lusaka, Zambia, through their 18-month commitment to a transmission prevention program.
View a slide show of Siamalambo and Elson

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe