New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Unique Bird Sheds Light on Sex Differences in the Brain

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


In the womb, sex hormones begin to tell a developing fetus whether to grow up male or female. For the past several decades, scientists have believed that sexual organs, which control these hormones, are solely responsible for the resulting differences between male and female brains. Now the study of an unusual songbird's brain promises to challenge that idea. Scientists have discovered that the half-female and half-male animal's gray matter developed two genetically distinct halves, providing striking evidence that the sex chromosomes within individual cells might play an important role in the development of gender-specific differences in the brain.

A team of scientists led by Arthur Arnold of the University of California at Los Angeles studied a zebra finch that was a gynandromorph, the equivalent of a hermaphrodite in humans. From the right the bird appeared to be male, displaying distinctly male red feathers around the eye and the black-and-white striping that earned the zebra finch its name. The plumage on the flipside, meanwhile, was distinctly female. The bird had both male and female gonads, yet acted male and sang the courtship song that only males sing. If gonadal hormones alone control sex-specific brain function, the two halves of the bird's brain that controls song (known as the song circuit) would be uniformly masculine or feminine. To determine whether this was the case, the team examined slices of the deceased animal's brain with an RNA probe able to detect the presence of sex chromosomes within individual brain cells. (In birds, the sex chromosomes are known as W and Z. Normal males have two Z chromosomes and females have one W and one Z chromosome.)

The scientists found that the right half of the brain contained almost no W chromosomes, whereas the left half was full of them, indicating genetically male and female halves of the brain. "It blew me away," Arnold says. The two sides of the brain were exposed to the same mix of hormones during development, yet the song circuit was much larger on the male side of the creature's brain than on the female side. The findings, published online this week by the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, provide the strongest evidence to date in support of the notion that sex chromosomes acting on single cells play a role in differences between male and female brains. These results might help determine whether the genetic sex of a cell influences its susceptibility to disease, Arnold explains. Certain conditions affect one sex more than the other, he notes, so "if the genetics of a cell affects the progress of a disease, it might suggest specific causes or treatments for disease."

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe