New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Unique Triple Asteroid System Discovered

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Astronomers have discovered a unique set of triplets: an asteroid with two moons orbiting it. Described in a report published today in the journal Nature, the rare combination is the first of its kind ever observed.

The asteroid is a 280-kilometer-wide body called 87 Sylvia, which was first sighted in 1866 and lies between Mars and Jupiter. Four years ago, scientists spotted a moon associated with the asteroid. Now Franck Marchis of the University of California at Berkeley and his colleagues have spied a second satellite circling 87 Sylvia using Yepun, one of the telescopes in the European Southern Observatory's Very Large Telescope array. "Since double asteroids seem to be common, people have been looking for multiple asteroids systems for a long time," Marchis says. "I couldn't believe we found one."

The newest moon, dubbed Remus, measures seven kilometers across and travels around 87 Slyvia once every 33 hours in an orbit about 710 kilometers from the asteroid. Researchers named the second 18-kilometer-wide moon, which takes almost 88 hours to circle Sylvia at a distance of 1,360 kilometers, Romulus. Detailed observations of the paths of the two smaller asteroids around Sylvia allowed the team to calculate its mass and density, which is only 20 percent higher than that of water. "It could be up to 60 percent empty space," posits study co-author Daniel Hestroffer of the Paris Observatory. The results suggest that Sylvia is a so-called rubble-pile asteroid, a patchwork of fragments created from a collision that later joined together. The small moons, they add, are most likely debris from the same collision that were later captured by the bigger body's gravitational pull.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe