New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Universe Cryptography

An artist's rendition of the Gaia spacecraft.

ESA, GAIA and DPAC (CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO)

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The story of how the universe came to be is constantly evolving. Indeed, a trove of fresh data rolling in from the Gaia spacecraft is refining our view of the early years of our galaxy. A violent collision with a second galaxy about eight to 11 billion years ago left a cohort of stars strewn askew from the plane of the Milky Way—the fingerprint of early galactic growing pains (see “Hidden History of the Milky Way Revealed by Extensive Star Maps”).

At the larger scale, the long-standing estimates of the rate of universe expansion are under scrutiny, as new measurements don’t seem to align with the old. Some novel fundamental physics may be at work (see “Have We Mismeasured the Universe?”). Rather than an ever evolving story of the universe, perhaps it has always been the same but written in a code we can’t understand or break. With each telescope, each spacecraft we send into space, each new technological advancement we achieve to collect data on Earth, we are learning how to read the code and deciphering its entirety piece by piece.

On a much smaller scale, a team at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology has turned two layers of graphene—a single-atom-thick layer of carbon—into a superconductor. The discovery has the potential to revolutionize several modern technologies, including transportation and computing (see “How ‘Magic Angle’ Graphene Is Stirring Up Physics”). Large or small, the physics code breakers are revealing quite a tale. Enjoy!

Andrea Gawrylewski is chief newsletter editor at Scientific American. She writes the daily Today in Science newsletter and oversees all other newsletters at the magazine. In addition, she manages all special editions and in the past was the editor for Scientific American Mind, Scientific American Space & Physics and Scientific American Health & Medicine. Gawrylewski got her start in journalism at the Scientist magazine, where she was a features writer and editor for "hot" research papers in the life sciences. She spent more than six years in educational publishing, editing books for higher education in biology, environmental science and nutrition. She holds a master's degree in earth science and a master's degree in journalism, both from Columbia University, home of the Pulitzer Prize.

More by Andrea Gawrylewski
SA Space & Physics Vol 2 Issue 2This article was published with the title “Universe Cryptography” in SA Space & Physics Vol. 2 No. 2 ()
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican042019-7hzLxfj2Np2cLkUJ4IR9LO

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe