Universe Cryptography

An artist's rendition of the Gaia spacecraft.

ESA, GAIA and DPAC (CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO)

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The story of how the universe came to be is constantly evolving. Indeed, a trove of fresh data rolling in from the Gaia spacecraft is refining our view of the early years of our galaxy. A violent collision with a second galaxy about eight to 11 billion years ago left a cohort of stars strewn askew from the plane of the Milky Way—the fingerprint of early galactic growing pains (see “Hidden History of the Milky Way Revealed by Extensive Star Maps”).

At the larger scale, the long-standing estimates of the rate of universe expansion are under scrutiny, as new measurements don’t seem to align with the old. Some novel fundamental physics may be at work (see “Have We Mismeasured the Universe?”). Rather than an ever evolving story of the universe, perhaps it has always been the same but written in a code we can’t understand or break. With each telescope, each spacecraft we send into space, each new technological advancement we achieve to collect data on Earth, we are learning how to read the code and deciphering its entirety piece by piece.

On a much smaller scale, a team at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology has turned two layers of graphene—a single-atom-thick layer of carbon—into a superconductor. The discovery has the potential to revolutionize several modern technologies, including transportation and computing (see “How ‘Magic Angle’ Graphene Is Stirring Up Physics”). Large or small, the physics code breakers are revealing quite a tale. Enjoy!

Andrea Gawrylewski is chief newsletter editor at Scientific American. She writes the daily Today in Science newsletter and oversees all other newsletters at the magazine. In addition, she manages all special editions and in the past was the editor for Scientific American Mind, Scientific American Space & Physics and Scientific American Health & Medicine. Gawrylewski got her start in journalism at the Scientist magazine, where she was a features writer and editor for "hot" research papers in the life sciences. She spent more than six years in educational publishing, editing books for higher education in biology, environmental science and nutrition. She holds a master's degree in earth science and a master's degree in journalism, both from Columbia University, home of the Pulitzer Prize.

More by Andrea Gawrylewski
SA Space & Physics Vol 2 Issue 2This article was published with the title “Universe Cryptography” in SA Space & Physics Vol. 2 No. 2 ()
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican042019-7hzLxfj2Np2cLkUJ4IR9LO

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe