New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Unstable Dye Blamed for Van Gogh's Fading Sunflowers

The artist’s famous flowers are turning from bright yellow to brown, because sulfates he used degrade under light

Chemists in Italy have proposed a reason why sulfate-rich lead chromate dyes, used widely in paintings, degrade under light.

Lead chromate dyes were a staple tool that Vincent van Gogh used widely in his art, including his iconic Sunflowers paintings. He enjoyed mixing pigments to obtain rich, striking colours but his favoured sulfate-rich dye, a mixture of yellow lead chromate and white lead sulfate, has been known to degrade under sunlight, fading the once vivid yellow of his Sunflowers series into duller paintings.

Last year, Koen Janssens from the University of Antwerp, Belgium, showed that this was due to sunlight reducing chromium(IV) to chromium(III), but reasons behind the dye’s instability remain unknown. This knowledge gap spurred Ana Muñoz-García and her colleagues at the University of Naples Federico II to investigate the process.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Using computers to model the structure of the sulfur-rich dye, they examined whether this degradation is only a surface phenomenon or due to the structure of the dye, and suggested a pathway for the process. Density functional theory (DFT) calculations indicated that the dye has unfavourable formation energy; the composition itself is unstable, separating back into its original chromate and sulfate phases, with the sulfate preferring to clump together. These segregated sulfates in the composite are to blame, as they absorb UV light, which reduces chromium to its duller green oxide. ‘Pure sulfate is the bad guy of the story,’ Muñoz-García tells Chemistry World. ‘All the sulfates want to be together to minimise stress in the material. So because of the segregation you generate that sulfate and because the sulfate absorbs in the UV, you get degradation.’

Will this discovery assist art preservation strategies? Muñoz-García hopes so. ‘From our calculations our conclusion, which is very sad, is that we cannot stop chromate being reduced, because this solution is unstable, but what we can do once we understand the surface process is to work with experimentalists trying to design a top layer that can stop the reduction of the separated chromate.’

Janssens, however, has reservations about the study. He explains that sulfur-rich dyes also darken under visible light, but highlights that an explanation for why some lead chromate–sulfate materials are found on the surface of paintings would be good to verify: ‘We have some experimental data on this and can now confront their predictions with reality; a more systematic verification is now very useful to do. In general, it will be useful to report a critical comparison between the experimental data and the theoretical predictions presented here.’ 

This article is reproduced with permission from Chemistry World. The article was first published on April 4, 2016.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe