Unstable Dye Blamed for Van Gogh's Fading Sunflowers

The artist’s famous flowers are turning from bright yellow to brown, because sulfates he used degrade under light

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Chemists in Italy have proposed a reason why sulfate-rich lead chromate dyes, used widely in paintings, degrade under light.

Lead chromate dyes were a staple tool that Vincent van Gogh used widely in his art, including his iconic Sunflowers paintings. He enjoyed mixing pigments to obtain rich, striking colours but his favoured sulfate-rich dye, a mixture of yellow lead chromate and white lead sulfate, has been known to degrade under sunlight, fading the once vivid yellow of his Sunflowers series into duller paintings.

Last year, Koen Janssens from the University of Antwerp, Belgium, showed that this was due to sunlight reducing chromium(IV) to chromium(III), but reasons behind the dye’s instability remain unknown. This knowledge gap spurred Ana Muñoz-García and her colleagues at the University of Naples Federico II to investigate the process.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Using computers to model the structure of the sulfur-rich dye, they examined whether this degradation is only a surface phenomenon or due to the structure of the dye, and suggested a pathway for the process. Density functional theory (DFT) calculations indicated that the dye has unfavourable formation energy; the composition itself is unstable, separating back into its original chromate and sulfate phases, with the sulfate preferring to clump together. These segregated sulfates in the composite are to blame, as they absorb UV light, which reduces chromium to its duller green oxide. ‘Pure sulfate is the bad guy of the story,’ Muñoz-García tells Chemistry World. ‘All the sulfates want to be together to minimise stress in the material. So because of the segregation you generate that sulfate and because the sulfate absorbs in the UV, you get degradation.’

Will this discovery assist art preservation strategies? Muñoz-García hopes so. ‘From our calculations our conclusion, which is very sad, is that we cannot stop chromate being reduced, because this solution is unstable, but what we can do once we understand the surface process is to work with experimentalists trying to design a top layer that can stop the reduction of the separated chromate.’

Janssens, however, has reservations about the study. He explains that sulfur-rich dyes also darken under visible light, but highlights that an explanation for why some lead chromate–sulfate materials are found on the surface of paintings would be good to verify: ‘We have some experimental data on this and can now confront their predictions with reality; a more systematic verification is now very useful to do. In general, it will be useful to report a critical comparison between the experimental data and the theoretical predictions presented here.’ 

This article is reproduced with permission from Chemistry World. The article was first published on April 4, 2016.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe