New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Updates: Whatever Happened to Drugs from Goats?

Also: updates on nanotech medicine, space shuttle Columbia's last moments, and the five aspects of taste

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Four-Legged Pharmacies
On February 6, a U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved a drug made by genetically modified animals—in this case, transgenic goats from Framingham, Mass.–based GTC Biotherapeutics. The goats generate the human protein antithrombin, which inhibits clotting. Called ATryn, the drug was already approved in Europe in 2006 [see “The Land of Milk and Money”; SciAm, November 2005, and “Old MacDonald’s Pharm”; SciAm, September 2006]. The company says that 150 transgenic goats could produce 100 kilograms of a protein drug a year for tens of millions of dollars. In comparison, a more conventional biotech system using vat-grown mammalian cells can run hundreds of millions in capital costs. Consumer advocates still voice caution, suggesting the FDA needs to ensure the goats do not enter the food supply.
—Charles Q. Choi

Columbia’s Last Moments The final minutes of Columbia, which broke up on reentry on February 1, 2003, hold lessons for future vehicles [see “Rethinking the Shuttle”; SciAm, April 2003]. On December 30, 2008, NASA released its definitive report regarding the crew. Although the accident was not survivable by any means, the agency found several safety flaws.

Relying on video analysis, recovered debris, medical findings and computer modeling, investigators conclude that the crew had about 40 seconds to recognize the situation and act before losing consciousness because of cabin depressurization. Shoulder restraints failed, allowing the crew’s upper bodies to move as the cabin spun out of control. The pressure helmets did not conform to the astronauts’ heads, like motorcycle helmets would, so they afforded little protection from impact. The report states that uncontrolled motions led to “injuries and lethal trauma.”


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


For new spacecraft, the report recommends several changes, such as better restraints and parachutes that do not have to be activated by a conscious crew. More fundamentally, NASA needs to incorporate safety systems into the design from the get-go (pressure suits came about only after the Challenger accident in 1986). The sobering, 400-page report is available at www.nasa.gov/news/reports/index.html

Savory Sensation
The much debated fifth taste, umami, has slowly been building credibility since its discovery in 1908 by Japanese chemist Kikunae Ikeda; most scientists believed that it was a mix of the other four tastes [see “Magnifying Taste”; SciAm, August 2008]. But research in the past 10 years has uncovered details of how the receptor picks up glutamate, found in protein-heavy foods such as meat, fish and legumes, and delivers a savory sensation. A recent study reveals how the receptor, shaped like a Venus flytrap, snaps shut on glutamate and how two other molecules can act as umami enhancers by binding next to the receptor and keeping glutamate in it for longer. The study appears in the December 30, 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA. 
—Kate Wilcox

Spin to Swim A goal in nanotechnology is a tiny engine that can power through blood vessels and microchip conduits, but fluid viscosity at this scale makes realizing such devices difficult [see “The Once and Future Nanomachine”; SciAm, September 2001]. A Spanish and British team has constructed tiny swimmers from beads made out of a plastic-magnetic material. The researchers used a short strand of DNA to connect a bead 2.8 microns wide with one (or more) that was a micron wide. A magnetic field can spin the beads, thereby moving them through narrow channels, the scientists report in the December 25, 2008, Journal of Physical Chemistry B.

Philip Yam is the managing editor of ScientificAmerican.com, responsible for the overall news content online. He began working at the magazine in 1989, first as a copyeditor and then as a features editor specializing in physics. He is the author of The Pathological Protein: Mad Cow, Chronic Wasting and Other Prion Diseases.

More by Philip Yam
Scientific American Magazine Vol 300 Issue 3This article was published with the title “Whatever happened to?” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 300 No. 3 (), p. 14
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican032009-19TrvmJfxdFHARV44048pv

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe