Updates: July 2007

Methane Mystery, Edible Vaccines, Sun's Swift Core and Painkillers

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

▪ Hepatitis-Beating Bananas

Potatoes, tomatoes and other edible plants might someday serve to immunize people, especially those in the developing world [see “Edible Vaccines,” Scientific American, September 2000]. In a review published in the June issue of Biotechnology Progress, Indian researchers conclude that bananas are the most promising edible vaccine against the hepatitis B virus, which lives in about 5 percent of the world's population. Potatoes have received more extensive study, but the researchers argue that bananas are the better choice because they can be eaten raw and taste good to most children. The task remains to boost the level of immune-triggering hepatitis protein in the fruit.

▪ Spin in the Sun


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


After staring at the sun for the past 11 years, the Solar and Heliospheric Observatory (SOHO) still has not gone blind. Designed to last only two years, the instruments onboard continue to provide surprises [see “SOHO Reveals the Secrets of the Sun,” Scientific American, March 1997]. Among the latest revelations: the sun's core rotates faster than its surface. Researchers reporting online May 3 in Science Express analyzed tiny vibrations in the solar surface that may originate from down-rushing plumes, which create waves that can pass through the core and reach the surface on the other side. These waves raise the surface only millimeters, but that is enough for researchers to analyze them and to conclude that the core rotates three to five times faster than its overlying layers. The extra spin may be a remnant of the sun's formation.

▪ Not beyond Vioxx Yet

The world still needs more effective ways to combat pain. On April 27 the FDA rejected Arcoxia, a COX-2 inhibitor for osteoarthritis intended as Merck's follow-on to Vioxx. New drugs under development might avoid the cardiovascular problems linked to the COX-2 compounds [see “Better Ways to Target Pain,” Scientific American, January 2007].

Philip Yam is the managing editor of ScientificAmerican.com, responsible for the overall news content online. He began working at the magazine in 1989, first as a copyeditor and then as a features editor specializing in physics. He is the author of The Pathological Protein: Mad Cow, Chronic Wasting and Other Prion Diseases.

More by Philip Yam
Scientific American Magazine Vol 297 Issue 1This article was published with the title “Updates” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 297 No. 1 (), p. 16
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0707-16

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe