New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Updates: July 2007

Methane Mystery, Edible Vaccines, Sun's Swift Core and Painkillers

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

▪ Hepatitis-Beating Bananas

Potatoes, tomatoes and other edible plants might someday serve to immunize people, especially those in the developing world [see “Edible Vaccines,” Scientific American, September 2000]. In a review published in the June issue of Biotechnology Progress, Indian researchers conclude that bananas are the most promising edible vaccine against the hepatitis B virus, which lives in about 5 percent of the world's population. Potatoes have received more extensive study, but the researchers argue that bananas are the better choice because they can be eaten raw and taste good to most children. The task remains to boost the level of immune-triggering hepatitis protein in the fruit.

▪ Spin in the Sun


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


After staring at the sun for the past 11 years, the Solar and Heliospheric Observatory (SOHO) still has not gone blind. Designed to last only two years, the instruments onboard continue to provide surprises [see “SOHO Reveals the Secrets of the Sun,” Scientific American, March 1997]. Among the latest revelations: the sun's core rotates faster than its surface. Researchers reporting online May 3 in Science Express analyzed tiny vibrations in the solar surface that may originate from down-rushing plumes, which create waves that can pass through the core and reach the surface on the other side. These waves raise the surface only millimeters, but that is enough for researchers to analyze them and to conclude that the core rotates three to five times faster than its overlying layers. The extra spin may be a remnant of the sun's formation.

▪ Not beyond Vioxx Yet

The world still needs more effective ways to combat pain. On April 27 the FDA rejected Arcoxia, a COX-2 inhibitor for osteoarthritis intended as Merck's follow-on to Vioxx. New drugs under development might avoid the cardiovascular problems linked to the COX-2 compounds [see “Better Ways to Target Pain,” Scientific American, January 2007].

Philip Yam is the managing editor of ScientificAmerican.com, responsible for the overall news content online. He began working at the magazine in 1989, first as a copyeditor and then as a features editor specializing in physics. He is the author of The Pathological Protein: Mad Cow, Chronic Wasting and Other Prion Diseases.

More by Philip Yam
Scientific American Magazine Vol 297 Issue 1This article was published with the title “Updates” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 297 No. 1 (), p. 16
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0707-16

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe