Upgraded Detectors May Soon “See” Colliding Black Holes

Upgraded detectors may soon “see” colliding black holes

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

In his 1994 book Black Holes and Time Warps, physicist Kip Thorne wrote of the tantalizing discoveries to come in the 21st century. In particular, the existence of gravitational waves—ripples in the fabric of space and time—might soon graduate from theoretical prediction to known fact. And those waves could carry all-important hints about their origins in the motion or collision of extremely massive objects.

“Gravitational-wave detectors will soon bring us observational maps of black holes, and the symphonic sounds of black holes colliding—symphonies filled with rich, new information about how warped spacetime behaves when wildly vibrating,” Thorne wrote.

That time is nearly upon us, he now believes. The California Institute of Technology theorist writes in the August 3 issue of Science that in five years' time, ongoing upgrades to the world's leading gravitational-wave observatories will make those instruments sensitive enough to detect the waves, which would provide yet another confirmation of Einstein's general theory of relativity. The detection would also open up a new regime for studying black holes, those cosmic gluttons whose gravitational pull is so strong that it forms a one-way funnel into their maw.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


As of now, astrophysicists can only infer the presence of a black hole by monitoring the environs around the putative object. In the case of Sagittarius A*, in the center of our own Milky Way galaxy, for instance, astronomers can see flares of radiation emanating from the black hole's location, caused by infalling material heating up and radiating outside the event horizon. Stars at the galactic center betray the presence of Sagittarius A* as well—their orbits point to the existence of a nearby compact object with the mass of four million suns.

The strong gravitational-wave signature expected from merging black holes would carry a wealth of information both about the objects involved and about their cataclysmic interaction.

Two major gravitational-wave detector projects have been on the lookout for these spacetime ripples, but so far the search has not produced any results. Both the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory (LIGO) and the Virgo observatory are L-shaped instruments with extremely long arms—four kilometers for the two LIGO facilities in Washington and Louisiana and three kilometers for Italy's Virgo. They rely on long-baseline interferometry, firing lasers down the perpendicular arms to see if one direction has been stretched or compressed relative to the other by a passing gravitational wave. “The advanced LIGO and advanced Virgo interferometers are now being installed and by 2017 should reach sensitivities at which black-hole mergers are observed,” Thorne writes. Sounds like the race is on to detect gravitational waves, one of the biggest prizes in physics.

Adapted from the Observations blog atblogs.ScientificAmerican.com/observations

COMMENT ATScientificAmerican.com/oct2012

John Matson is a former reporter and editor for Scientific American who has written extensively about astronomy and physics.

More by John Matson
Scientific American Magazine Vol 307 Issue 4This article was published with the title “Urge to Merge” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 307 No. 4 (), p. 28
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1012-28b

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe