New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

US-China Deal Intended to Speed Clean Coal Research

The world's two largest emitters of greenhouse gases will share innovative technologies to clean up coal burning

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

U.S. and Chinese officials heading up a series of joint advanced coal projects Friday signed an intellectual property agreement meant to ease the sharing of innovative technology while protecting patents and licensing agreements.

Companies collaborating on research and development projects tied to the U.S.-China Clean Energy Research Center (CERC), a program started in 2009, can enter into regular commercial contracts. But energy technology companies participating in the U.S.-China program must negotiate licenses "in good faith" to ensure both nations benefit.

Inventors of technology can set the terms, according to a description of the agreement, including royalties and limits on the use of an invention. But the terms cannot be so restrictive that they in essence bar the sharing of advanced coal technology by the United States and China.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Major energy companies have a stake in the plan for protecting intellectual property, including U.S. energy giants General Electric and Duke Energy and the French conglomerate Alstom. U.S. and Chinese officials visiting the West Virginia University campus in Morgantown to sign the agreement Friday said the governments also have a lot to gain by greasing the wheels for further cooperation on clean energy.

Robert Marlay, director of the CERC program out of the U.S. Department of Energy, said the intellectual property agreement flows from direct talks among U.S. and Chinese leaders, "suggesting diplomatic and binding support of the agreement."

Ending a culture of distrust?
With both governments putting their stamps of approval on an enforceable approach to intellectual property, Marlay said, U.S. and Chinese companies could be more willing to work together.

U.S. developers of energy technology have been wary about making innovations available to Chinese energy producers for fear their inventions will be copied. Chinese companies are also doing more inventing, and the nation's patent laws are becoming more sophisticated. That has spurred both sides to negotiate a solution.

The agreement, officials said, is meant to cut through a culture of distrust that has kept American and Chinese scientists and companies from collaborating on potential solutions to the knottiest energy issues. China and the United States are the world's biggest users of energy and producers of greenhouse gas emissions tied to global warming. They both rely on coal, and cutting emissions at coal-burning power plants and other industrial plants is the goal of one of three programs tied to U.S.-China CERC.

Joint research is attempting to advance technology for capturing and storing carbon dioxide emissions, turning coal into natural gas and stripping coal of its pollutants while it is used at a power plant. It is also working on capturing carbon produced at plants designed to turn coal into diesel fuel.

"With today's signing, our consortium members can know that their own intellectual property will be protected," said Jerald Fletcher, a professor at West Virginia University and director of the U.S. advanced coal consortium under U.S.-China CERC. "New technologies created by the U.S.-China teams will be shared in a fair and clearly defined manner."

Cooperation more possible on other technologies
Besides coal, CERC includes partnerships to speed the development of electric vehicles and expand measures in both countries to cut energy use and emissions from buildings.

Officials and the consortia of corporate and research partners tied to the three programs plan to use the advanced coal intellectual property plan as a model.

Protecting technology tied to electric vehicles is viewed as a particularly sticky issue for both countries. U.S.- and China-based companies are racing to commercialize battery technology and grab a potentially big global market for electric vehicles.

Sources said a significant challenge has been writing rules that adhere to intellectual property laws in both countries. Pre-existing intellectual property agreements remain protected.

The effort this year for advanced coal technology included nearly 20 drafts, in two languages, and sought the input of U.S. companies. It was written to ensure a better deal on intellectual property protection for companies that sign on as partners in the U.S.-China program.

The agreement is expected to be signed by Energy Secretary Steven Chu and his Chinese counterpart at a meeting in Beijing in September.

Reprinted from Climatewire with permission from Environment & Energy Publishing, LLC. www.eenews.net, 202-628-6500

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe