U.S. Commits to Greenhouse Gas Cuts under Copenhagen Climate Accord

U.S. plans to cut emissions 4 percent below 1990 levels by 2020--other countries such as China, India will submit plans, as well

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The U.S. officially committed in writing yesterday to the greenhouse gas emission cuts proposed by President Obama in Copenhagen—4 percent below 1990 levels by 2020. The letter to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) commits the nation to combat climate change, but with a caveat: any such commitment must be backed by legislation, which has not passed the U.S. Senate.

"The U.S. submission reflects President Obama's continued commitment to meeting the climate change and clean energy challenge through robust domestic and international action that will strengthen our economy, enhance our national security, and protect our environment," said U.S. climate negotiator Todd Stern in a prepared statement announcing the commitment. "We expect that all major economies will honor their agreement in Copenhagen to submit their mitigation targets or actions."

Already, four major developing countries—Brazil, China, India and South Africa—have indicated they will also submit their national plans by the January 31 deadline as part of the Copenhagen Accord. China will cut its carbon intensity (the amount of greenhouse gas emitted per widget produced) by at least 40 percent; India has promised a similar intensity cut of at least 20 percent. Brazil, meanwhile, has passed a law that requires the country to cut greenhouse gas emissions by at least 36 percent below present values by 2020, whereas South Africa will slow the rise of its greenhouse gas emissions from coal by 34 percent by the same year. Also, the European Union will cut its overall emissions by at least 20 percent below 1990 levels by 2020.

At least 29 countries have indicated they will join the accord, representing more than 70 percent of global greenhouse gas emissions, according to the U.S. Climate Action Network. "The Copenhagen Accord reflects a political consensus on the long-term, global response to climate change," said UNFCCC Executive Secretary Yvo de Boer at a January 20 press conference. "If countries follow up Copenhagen's outcomes calmly, with eyes firmly fixed on the advantage of collective action, they have every chance of completing the job."

The Copenhagen Accord, however, is not a legally binding treaty, de Boer noted—something the world now hopes to have in place for the next global climate summit in Mexico City this fall. That means the accord's provisions may or may not be honored.

But the federal government will cut its own greenhouse gas emissions—at facilities ranging from the U.S. Department of Defense to the Post Office—by 28 percent by 2020, regardless of legislative action, per plans released today to fulfill an Obama administration executive order. The U.S. currently operates more than 600,000 vehicles, purchases more than $500 billion in goods and services, and occupies nearly 500,000 buildings—all of which will now be subject to a series of goals, such as a 30 percent reduction in petroleum use by 2020.

For example, the Internal Revenue Service will revamp its facility in Andover, Md., to reduce energy use by more than 25 percent through light monitors, rooftop photovoltaic solar cells, efficient electrical devices, and a geothermal heating and cooling system.

"As the largest energy consumer in the United States, we have a responsibility to American citizens to reduce our energy use and become more efficient," Obama said in a prepared statement to announce the programs. "Our goal is to lower costs, reduce pollution, and shift federal energy expenses away from oil and towards local, clean energy."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe