New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

U.S. Seeks to Protect Forests to Save Wild Reindeer

The estimated 46 mountain caribou in the Selkirk Mountains, which bridge the U.S.-Canada border, are all that remain in the country

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

(Reuters) - The U.S. government proposed protecting old-growth forests in Idaho and Washington state on Tuesday to save the nation's dwindling population of mountain caribou, popularly known as wild reindeer.

Under the plan, roughly 375,000 acres of mostly U.S. Forest Service land in the Selkirk Mountains in northern Idaho and northeastern Washington would be designated as critical habitat for the reclusive caribou.

The estimated 46 mountain caribou in the Selkirks, which bridge the border between the United States and Canada, are all that remain in the country, said Susan Burch, branch chief in Idaho for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


It is unknown how many of the woodland mammals once inhabited the high country in Idaho, Washington and British Columbia, but their numbers had dwindled to just 30 when they were added to the federal endangered species list in 1984.

Unlike other types of caribou, some of which live in Alaska, the Selkirk band inhabit elevations above 4,000 feet and rely on old-growth forests for food and protection from predators, government scientists said.

The greatest threat to survival of the animal is fragmentation of its territory by logging, wildfires, road-building and recreation trails, according to the service.

Both male and female caribou have antlers and range in weight from 175 to 400 pounds. They seasonally migrate up and down mountains, climbing over packed snow in the winter to feed on lichens on century-old cedars and spruces.

Their reclusive habits and the remote country they inhabit are among reasons there are gaps in historical data, Burch said.

"By the time anyone realized something had died, there was nothing left to look at," she said.

The plan to earmark habitat, which would likely limit such activities as timber harvests, mining and development of recreational areas, is open for public comment until the end of January.

After years of litigation, environmentalists and the government struck a deal in 2009 that required the service to propose habitat protections for Selkirk caribou this month. The service is meant to make a final decision on the measure in a year.

It was not immediately clear if groups promoting access on public lands would object to the proposal. Officials with the BlueRibbon Coalition, a national nonprofit in Idaho that advocates for off-highway vehicle and other forms of motorized recreation, declined to comment when contacted on Tuesday.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe