U.S. Seeks to Protect Forests to Save Wild Reindeer

The estimated 46 mountain caribou in the Selkirk Mountains, which bridge the U.S.-Canada border, are all that remain in the country

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

(Reuters) - The U.S. government proposed protecting old-growth forests in Idaho and Washington state on Tuesday to save the nation's dwindling population of mountain caribou, popularly known as wild reindeer.

Under the plan, roughly 375,000 acres of mostly U.S. Forest Service land in the Selkirk Mountains in northern Idaho and northeastern Washington would be designated as critical habitat for the reclusive caribou.

The estimated 46 mountain caribou in the Selkirks, which bridge the border between the United States and Canada, are all that remain in the country, said Susan Burch, branch chief in Idaho for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


It is unknown how many of the woodland mammals once inhabited the high country in Idaho, Washington and British Columbia, but their numbers had dwindled to just 30 when they were added to the federal endangered species list in 1984.

Unlike other types of caribou, some of which live in Alaska, the Selkirk band inhabit elevations above 4,000 feet and rely on old-growth forests for food and protection from predators, government scientists said.

The greatest threat to survival of the animal is fragmentation of its territory by logging, wildfires, road-building and recreation trails, according to the service.

Both male and female caribou have antlers and range in weight from 175 to 400 pounds. They seasonally migrate up and down mountains, climbing over packed snow in the winter to feed on lichens on century-old cedars and spruces.

Their reclusive habits and the remote country they inhabit are among reasons there are gaps in historical data, Burch said.

"By the time anyone realized something had died, there was nothing left to look at," she said.

The plan to earmark habitat, which would likely limit such activities as timber harvests, mining and development of recreational areas, is open for public comment until the end of January.

After years of litigation, environmentalists and the government struck a deal in 2009 that required the service to propose habitat protections for Selkirk caribou this month. The service is meant to make a final decision on the measure in a year.

It was not immediately clear if groups promoting access on public lands would object to the proposal. Officials with the BlueRibbon Coalition, a national nonprofit in Idaho that advocates for off-highway vehicle and other forms of motorized recreation, declined to comment when contacted on Tuesday.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe