New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Use of “Smart Drugs” on the Rise

European nations see biggest increases in use of stimulants such as Ritalin by people seeking brain-boosting effects

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The use of drugs by people hoping to boost mental performance is rising worldwide, finds the largest ever study of the trend. In a survey of tens of thousands of people, 14 percent reported using stimulants at least once in the preceding 12 months in 2017, up from 5 percent in 2015.

The nonmedical use of substances—often dubbed smart drugs—to increase memory or concentration is known as pharmacological cognitive enhancement (PCE), and it rose in all 15 nations included in the survey. The study looked at prescription medications such as Adderall and Ritalin—prescribed medically to treat attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)—as well as the sleep-disorder medication modafinil and illegal stimulants such as cocaine.

The work, published in the International Journal of Drug Policy in June, is based on the Global Drug Survey—an annual, anonymous online questionnaire about drug use worldwide. The survey had 79,640 respondents in 2015 and 29,758 in 2017.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


US respondents reported the highest rate of use: in 2017, nearly 30 percent said they had used drugs for PCE at least once in the preceding 12 months, up from 20 percent in 2015.

But the largest increases were in Europe: use in France rose from 3 percent in 2015 to 16 percent in 2017; and from 5 percent to 23 percent in the United Kingdom. An informal reader survey by Nature in 2008 found that one in five respondents had used drugs to boost concentration or memory.

The latest analysis is impressive in its size, says Barbara Sahakian, a neuroscientist at the University of Cambridge, UK, who was not involved in the work. There is an increasing "lifestyle use" of cognitive-enhancing drugs by healthy people, which raises ethical concerns, she says.

Cultural factors, the prevalence of ADHD diagnoses and availability all influence which drugs are used for PCE and the rate of use, says Larissa Maier, a psychologist at the University of California, San Francisco, who led the study.

In the United States, where ADHD diagnoses are high and medication is a common treatment, 22 percent of respondents said they had used amphetamine-combination drugs such as Adderall for PCE. Those drugs are not approved in the European Union, where methylphenidate—sold under various trade names, including Ritalin—is more commonly used.

The study suggests that the spread of US-style practices in ADHD treatment is driving the trend and making drugs more available: countries with higher rates of ADHD diagnoses, such as the United States, Canada and Australia, have higher rates of nonmedical prescription-drug use for cognitive enhancement.

“The increased diagnoses of ADHD and their prescription drug use is creating a substantial population of young pharmacologically medicated persons whose underlying problems may very likely be located in their social world,” says Steven Rose, a neuroscientist at the Open University in Milton Keynes, UK.

Nearly half (48 percent) of people said they obtained the drugs through friends; 10 percent bought them from a dealer or over the Internet; 6 percent obtained them from a family member; and 4 percent said that they had their own prescriptions.

Debate continues over whether the nonmedical use of prescription drugs boosts brain performance. Data suggest that some people benefit from certain drugs in specific situations—for example, surgeons using modafinil—but larger population-wide studies report lesser gains, and conflicting results.

Maier notes that respondents to the Global Drug Survey are more likely than the general population to be interested in drug use, which could bias results. But she says that similar rates of nonmedical use of smart drugs are seen in studies of the general population, suggesting that the findings are robust.

This article is reproduced with permission and was first published on July 5, 2018.

First published in 1869, Nature is the world's leading multidisciplinary science journal. Nature publishes the finest peer-reviewed research that drives ground-breaking discovery, and is read by thought-leaders and decision-makers around the world.

More by Nature magazine
SA Mind Vol 29 Issue 5This article was published with the title “Use of “Smart Drugs” on the Rise” in SA Mind Vol. 29 No. 5 (), p. 8
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind0918-8

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe