Vaccine Fights Fat in Rats

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

A vaccine that trains the immune system to attack a hormone thought to control appetite has shown promise in preventing weight gain in a small pilot study in rats. If supported by subsequent research, the vaccine could help win the battle of the bulge--the large and growing problem of human obesity.

Using a technique first employed to battle drug addiction, chemist Kim Janda at the Scripps Research Institute and his colleagues synthesized a vaccine that would convince a rat's immune system that ghrelin--a hormone secreted by the stomach in humans and thought to induce hunger--was an invading antigen. By manipulating the ghrelin molecule and hitching it to a carrier protein and adjuvant, the team succeeded in crafting three different versions of the potential vaccine.

After four inoculations, 10 rats given either of two of those vaccines gained less weight than four rats on the third version and three control rats--despite the same food intake. "All worked well in terms of getting an immune response but only two impacted basic weight processes," Janda says. "They slowed the rate of weight gain and decreased the amount of [fat] tissue."


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Postmortem analysis proved that the vaccinated rats gained lean mass rather than fat and raised hopes that a vaccine for obesity might one day be available. That day is not likely to come anytime soon, Janda cautions, as the vaccines must first prove their efficacy in larger trials as well as experiments with clinically obese animals and rats fed a high-fat diet similar to the one thought to be driving the unprecedented weight gain worldwide. The paper presenting this initial research appears online this week in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe