New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Van Gogh's Sunflowers Were Genetic Mutants

Researchers discover the genetic secret behind van Gogh's famous sunflowers

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The word “sunflower” brings to mind a mane of vibrant yellow petals encircling a dark whorl of seeds. But not all sunflowers are alike. Some sunflowers have scraggly petals, for instance, or small centers. Many of the sunflowers Vincent van Gogh depicted in his famous series of oil paintings look rather unusual—they sport woolly, chrysanthemumlike blooms. Now scientists have pinpointed the genetic mutation responsible for these strange sunflowers’ abundance of small yellow petals.

Van Gogh’s paintings from the late 1880s clearly feature some typical sunflowers, but they are paired with what look like fuzzy pom-poms stuck on sunflower stems. Such double-flowered sunflowers, as they are known, have overlapping rows of supple yellow petals and a small, sometimes hidden, center. In a new study, John Burke of the University of Georgia and his co-workers traced the unusual floral arrangement of van Gogh’s sunflowers to mutations of a single critical gene. The findings appear in the March 29 PLoS Genetics.

Burke and his colleagues worked with typical sunflowers as well as double-flowered cultivars, such as the teddy bear sunflower, which looks like a giant dandelion. By crossing different varieties of sunflowers with one another and crossing their offspring with themselves, the researchers discovered that double-flowered cultivars have mutated forms of a gene called HaCYC2c.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


For thousands of years people have been growing sunflowers for their seeds, oil and beauty. The first double-flowered sunflowers probably arose naturally as the result of a chance mutation. Breeders very likely seized the opportunity to preserve the mutants’ unique qualities and offer customers a new kind of sunflower. Apparently van Gogh was one such customer.

This article was published in print as "Beautiful Mutants."

Ferris Jabr is a contributing writer for Scientific American. He has also written for the New York Times Magazine, the New Yorker and Outside.

More by Ferris Jabr
Scientific American Magazine Vol 306 Issue 5This article was published with the title “Van Gogh's Sunflowers Were Genetic Mutants” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 306 No. 5 ()
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican062012-6hNLv59yO52MmseqfklZQM

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe