Vancouver's Island

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


A return made by the Hudson&s Bay Com pany to the British House of Commons, com municates some interesting particulars res pecting Vancouver&s Island. One thousand lour hundred and seventy-eight acres of land have been sold to eleven persons; the fur trade of the Company were in possession of 3,084 acres, part of which they have sold to their retired servants. The Puget Sound Company have provided four farms to employ emigrants on their first arrival. The Hud son&s Bay and Puget&sSound Companies have, at their own expense, sent out 271 males, 80 women and 84 children, since 1848. These emigrants were mostly agricultural laborers under engagement. One thousand, three hun dred and fifteen tons of coal have been collected by the Indians, from the surface seams, and had been exported by the Company. The Company had incurred considerable expense in boring for coal without suecess, until late ly, when promising appaarances had been dis covered about eighty miles north of Fort Vic toria, on the east coast of the Island, nearly opposite the mouth of Fraser&s river. Mea sures had been taken to follow out the search and work the coal if found practicable. The high rates of wages in Oregon and Califor nia had tended to the detriment of the Island. Flour had still to be imported for the use of the settlers.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 8 Issue 28This article was published with the title “Vancouver's Island” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 8 No. 28 (), p. 218
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican03261853-218a

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe