New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Venus de Seismo

New orbiter begins to listen for venusquakes

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Around 500 million years ago, something awful seems to have happened on Venus. Maybe in spurts or maybe all at once, a fury of volcanism paved over nearly the entire surface. Some scientists think Earth's planetary sister could have supported life for billions of years, yet scarcely a trace now remains of that lost world. To fathom why a planet would have done such a thing to itself, researchers need to know its inner torment.

"Unraveling the mystery of why terrestrial planets evolve the way they do really requires that we understand the interior structure of Venus," says planetary scientist Ellen Stofan of Proxemy Research, an institute based in Laytonsville, Md. "This question links strongly back to the whole issue of why Earth is habitable and Venus apparently not."

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe