Venus in Repose

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

If we see someone attractive, we say he or she is “easy on the eyes.” Now new research suggests that beautiful faces, paintings, objects or patterns are attractive because they are easy on the mind.

Previous research showed that people tend to find typical things more attractive, from watches to birds to faces. In fact, researchers found that the secret to creating an attractive face was to “average” many faces into a digital composite (right). One idea is that evolution adapted us to like typical-looking faces because they suggest good health in a prospective mate. But this notion does not explain why we would like typicality in cars, fish or other things we are not trying to mate with.

It turns out that our brains might simply “like” stimuli that do not take too much effort to process, says Piotr Winkielman, a psychologist at the University of California, San Diego. And that holds whether we are looking at a human face or a pattern of dots.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Winkielman and his colleagues created two different random patterns out of eight dots. They called one of the patterns an “Ack” and the other one a “Blub.” Then they showed people variations of these two patterns and asked them to rate each pattern as either an Ack or a Blub.

The closer each pattern was to its prototype, the faster people were able to make the classification and the more attractive they found the pattern—even though it was just a series of random dots with no obvious aesthetic value. The easier the pattern was to perceive, the prettier people found it.

“I think ultimately there's a reward for successful perception,” Winkielman says. “There's an internal brain reward for processing efficiency. By making the pattern easier to perceive, we're letting the brain give itself a pat on the proverbial back.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe