Vietnam Veterans Had Higher Death Rate than Other Vets after Discharge

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

Serving in a war carries with it the possibility of being wounded or dying in combat. But new research suggests that veterans who served in Vietnam also had also higher death rates after returning home than did veterans who served tours of duty elsewhere.

Service in Vietnam exposed soldiers to a variety of potential health risks, ranging from psychological stress to infectious diseases and chemicals. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) launched the Vietnam Experience Study (VES) to gauge the health effects of military service there, but the initial study ended in 1983. For the new report, a team led by Tegan K. Catlin Boehmer of the CDC followed more than 18,000 veterans through 2000, resulting in more than 30 years of health data. The researchers report in the latest issue of the Archives of Internal Medicine that during the first five years after discharge, Vietnam veterans experienced a death rate 7 percent higher than that of other veterans. For the remainder of the study period, however, there was no statistically significant difference in the death rates between the two groups.

The higher death rate among Vietnam veterans resulted from an increase in external causes of death, the team found. The authors note that their ¿findings corroborate those of previous research linking combat exposure with elevated illicit drug use, and post-traumatic stress disorder with traumatic deaths, including unintentional poisonings.¿

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American