New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Vocal Learning Similar in Humans, Birds

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


A baby songbird doesn't emerge from the egg singing perfectly. It starts out babbling and gradually refines its tune over time. Human infants follow a similar developmental path when learning to talk. Scientists have thus often compared the acquisition of human speech to that of birdsong. But whether the mechanisms of vocal development are the same in humans and birds is a question few studies have tackled. To that end, new research should prove insightful. According to a report published online this week by the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, babbling human babies respond to social cues from their mothers in much the way that avian babies do.

Previous efforts to understand how babies learn to talk had focused on the role of imitation in speech acquisition. In the new work, psychologist Michael H. Goldstein of Franklin and Marshall College and his colleagues turned their attention to social interactions between eight-month-old infants and their mothers. The researchers directed the mothers to act in certain ways while responding to their baby's utterances during 30-minute play sessions. "The mothers did not change how they talked but whether they touched or smiled at the baby," team member Meredith West of Indiana University explains. Like songbird chicks, the investigators found, the babies registered the social consequences of sound-making and adjusted their babbling accordingly.

West describes the findings as the first to show "that babies change how they vocalize in response to social responses--not sounds, but sights--by using more mature sounds." Remarks Goldstein: "This project shows that maternal behavior and infant sensory capacities interact to generate the development of more advanced infant behavior. It shows that social learning is a crucial part of vocal development."

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and was formerly senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe