New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Volcanic Tremors May Help Predict Massive Eruptions

New ways of modeling tremors that precede volcanic eruptions may help warn of impending disaster

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Earthquakes often precede explosive volcanic eruptions such as the devastating outburst from Mount St. Helens in 1980. But attempts to use tremors to predict the timing and force of such explosions have proved unsuccessful for decades. Now multidisciplinary teams of researchers have developed models that could help warn of disastrous eruptions hours to days before they happen.

A group of scientists at the University of Leeds in England investigated the mystery of why volcanic tremors come in clusters and why they can occur at multiple depths within volcanoes. The answer may lie in how magma behaves: much like Silly Putty, it shatters if pulled apart quickly. When magma rising within a volcano’s main conduit ruptures, the magma develops deep cracks. These cracks weaken the magma, helping it rupture at other points and flow more quickly, which causes still more shattering to occur.

Such a series of ruptures may explain the swarms of low-frequency earthquakes that past research has detected from volcanoes. Analysis of such tremors could determine how fast magma is ascending “and thus can be used to forecast explosions,” says geophysicist Jürgen Neuberg of Leeds. Neuberg and his Leeds colleague Mark Thomas detailed their findings online March 2 in Geology.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


A model developed by another team considers tremors created by columns of magma within a volcano that wag back and forth within its main conduit like a metronome rod. The rate at which the magma wagging occurs matches the dominant frequency of most volcanic tremors, reports volcanologist and geophysicist Mark Jellinek of the University of British Columbia, who described his team’s work in the February 24, 2011, issue of Nature. (Scientific American is part of Nature Publishing Group.)

As explosive eruptions near, this model indicates the volcanic tremor frequency would rise in a predictable manner: explosive eruptions would generate gas that would constrict the magma column into a stiffer, thinner shape that would wobble faster. Both research teams say they need to further refine their models with additional data from volcanoes. Any future attempts to predict explosive eruptions will also need to look at changes in gas emissions and how volcanoes physically deform before explosions. “If we take all these data together, we might be able to prevent tragedies,” Neuberg says.

This article was published in print as "Thar She Blows!"

Charles Q. Choi is a frequent contributor to Scientific American. His work has also appeared in The New York Times, Science, Nature, Wired, and LiveScience, among others. In his spare time, he has traveled to all seven continents.

More by Charles Q. Choi
Scientific American Magazine Vol 306 Issue 5This article was published with the title “Thar She Blows!” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 306 No. 5 (), p. 21
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0612-21

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe