Want Clean Water and Rich Soil? Save More Species

Specific species matter in delivering specific ecosystem services, but for the broad range of those functions the number and diversity of species matters, too

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The grasslands of Europe may seem like a simple ecosystem, lacking the rich array of species that inhabit tropical rain forests. But a new study probing the response of relatively simple meadows to reductions in the diversity of native plants reveals that biodiversity plays a key role in ensuring the broadest range of ecosystem services, such as clean water and fertile soil.

Previous studies have shown that for specific ecosystem services, such as nutrient cycling, biodiversity did not seem to matter. "You could lose species without seeing much impact," says ecologist Andrew Hector of the University of Zurich, who partnered with fellow ecologist Robert Bagchi of the University of Oxford on the new research. "We found that higher levels of biodiversity were required to support ecosystem functioning in total."

Basically, different types of grassland plants provide varying types of services, with some overlap. "When we looked at the groups of species that affected different pairs of ecosystem services, they shared only one fifth to one half in common," Hector notes. By tracking as many as seven ecosystem services—ranging from clean water to total production of hay—they found that a panoply of plant species was required to maintain these functions.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The research, published in Nature, primarily examined plants and to a lesser extent microbes and insects. "The same idea could apply [to insects and germs]," Hector says. "Loss of biodiversity could lead to vacant or underexploited niches and this could have a negative impact on ecosystem functioning and services."

Hector, for one, has moved on to the Sabah Biodiversity Experiment, designed to examine this question in the tropics. Experimental plots of roughly 3,000 square acres have been planted with either one, four or 16 different species of dipterocarp trees—the tallest trees in the rain forest of Malaysian Borneo, which have been largely eliminated by logging. "We want to know if replanting with a more diverse mixture of species can help restore fully functional forest ecosystems when compared to the more usual practice of planting [one]," he says. Indications from the grasslands of Europe are that he will need as many species as he can get.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe