New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Want Clean Water and Rich Soil? Save More Species

Specific species matter in delivering specific ecosystem services, but for the broad range of those functions the number and diversity of species matters, too

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The grasslands of Europe may seem like a simple ecosystem, lacking the rich array of species that inhabit tropical rain forests. But a new study probing the response of relatively simple meadows to reductions in the diversity of native plants reveals that biodiversity plays a key role in ensuring the broadest range of ecosystem services, such as clean water and fertile soil.

Previous studies have shown that for specific ecosystem services, such as nutrient cycling, biodiversity did not seem to matter. "You could lose species without seeing much impact," says ecologist Andrew Hector of the University of Zurich, who partnered with fellow ecologist Robert Bagchi of the University of Oxford on the new research. "We found that higher levels of biodiversity were required to support ecosystem functioning in total."

Basically, different types of grassland plants provide varying types of services, with some overlap. "When we looked at the groups of species that affected different pairs of ecosystem services, they shared only one fifth to one half in common," Hector notes. By tracking as many as seven ecosystem services—ranging from clean water to total production of hay—they found that a panoply of plant species was required to maintain these functions.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The research, published in Nature, primarily examined plants and to a lesser extent microbes and insects. "The same idea could apply [to insects and germs]," Hector says. "Loss of biodiversity could lead to vacant or underexploited niches and this could have a negative impact on ecosystem functioning and services."

Hector, for one, has moved on to the Sabah Biodiversity Experiment, designed to examine this question in the tropics. Experimental plots of roughly 3,000 square acres have been planted with either one, four or 16 different species of dipterocarp trees—the tallest trees in the rain forest of Malaysian Borneo, which have been largely eliminated by logging. "We want to know if replanting with a more diverse mixture of species can help restore fully functional forest ecosystems when compared to the more usual practice of planting [one]," he says. Indications from the grasslands of Europe are that he will need as many species as he can get.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe