Wanted: Bright Ideas to Change the World

Acting Editor in Chief Mariette DiChristina introduces the December 2009 issue of Scientific American

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

One of 100 billion nerve cells in the human brain, the neuron waits, ready. Suddenly, a neigh­bor releases signaling molecules with an attention-getting message, like the irresistible chatter of a next-door gossip who has a hot tidbit. The receiving cell, excited, experiences fluctuations in ion concentration, creating a small electric current flow. Then it, too, releases communication signals down the line. The cascade continues until a large region of the brain is buzzing with heightened processing. Imaging scans would reveal the additional blood flow and electrical activity as thousands of neurons flare in response.

A good idea can be like that—it stirs everything up—whether it is being shared throughout a network of cells in one person’s brain or in the world at large, through a community of people. Good ideas motivate us to action. They lead us to reflect on how to make things better. They spur us not to settle only for what is possible today.

That is why we are celebrating a set of innovative projects with our cover story for this issue, “World Changing Ideas.” In this new annual section, we detail 20 ways to push the frontiers in areas that are critical to improving modern life: energy, transportation, environment, electronics and robotics, and health and medicine. Some of the inventions are dazzlingly simple—such as how Solar­City, headquartered in California, removes the biggest obstacle to solar-panel installations by homeowners: their upfront cost. Some are head-thumpingly obvious in hindsight, such as employing zoning to thwart the currently nearly uninhibited resource depletion of the world’s oceans. (For more on that topic, see this month's Perspectives.) And some, such as Hewlett-Packard’s Central Nervous System for the Earth, a planned array of up to a trillion pushpin-size sensors for the globe, are mind-bendingly sophisticated in their scope and potential implications.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


All the concepts in this section inspire hope that advances in science and technology will keep improving our lives in the years ahead. Read the article, then, for a look at the future.

One place where humanity’s creative problem-solving abilities are in high demand is in the battle against global climate change. While government policy leaders debate their countries’ responses to this phenomenon, it continues to disrupt ecosystems with unsettling speed. As Katey Walter Anthony describes in “Methane: A Menace Surfaces,” thawing Arctic permafrost is doing more than causing damage by heaving and cracking the foundations of buildings: it is also creating lakes that emit methane, a gas that, pound for pound, has more than 20 times the heat-trapping power of carbon dioxide. These new methane emissions could accelerate the process of global warming. Walter Anthony’s research serves as yet more evidence for the great need to address this problem. But will we act on our ideas in time?

Note: This article was originally printed with the title, "Wanted: Bright Ideas."

Mariette DiChristina, Steering Group chair, is dean and professor of the practice in journalism at the Boston University College of Communication. She was formerly editor in chief of Scientific American and executive vice president, Magazines, for Springer Nature.

More by Mariette DiChristina
Scientific American Magazine Vol 301 Issue 6This article was published with the title “Wanted: Bright Ideas to Change the World” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 301 No. 6 ()
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican122009-7FmhdipMTKAVZ0Ww3qXdDX

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe