War in Ukraine Does Not Diminish NATO’s Need to Act on Climate, Report Says

Addressing the climate crisis is a crucial aspect of maintaining the security of member states, a former official writes

American soldiers walk through a fenced area.

U.S. Army soldiers assigned to the 82nd Airborne carry military equipment as they take part in an exercise outside the operating base at the Arlamow Airport in Poland. The U.S. and other NATO members have deployed additional troops across eastern European countries in response to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

NATO’s role in maintaining security in Europe has never been more critical following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. That includes protecting member nations from climate change, according to new analysis from the German Marshall Fund of the United States.

In the fund’s latest installment of a series of reports called “NATO in a New Era: Global Shifts, Global Challenges,” Jamie Shea, NATO’s former deputy assistant secretary general for emerging security challenges, said member states must not lose sight of security issues that go beyond political and physical borders.

“Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has impacted NATO’s objectives on climate change, but its climate agenda does not have to be incompatible with its military operational priorities,” Shea wrote in the analysis published on the think tank’s website.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The analysis comes more than two weeks since Russia invaded its non-NATO neighbor Ukraine, bringing the post-World War II alliance to its highest alert level since the end of the Cold War.

In addition to the human toll, the invasion has disrupted global energy markets and raised questions about energy security across Europe, which has been weaning itself from fossil fuel-based electricity since the early 1990s.

Germany’s decision to withhold certification of the Nord Stream 2 pipeline, expected to deliver 55 billion cubic meters of Russian natural gas annually to Europe, has triggered anxiety among some NATO member states that rely on fossil fuels for energy, though European Union officials have downplayed its significance, noting that the line was not yet operating.

Shea, who is based in Brussels, was unavailable for a telephone interview. A spokesperson for the fund said Shea began writing the assessment before the Russian army crossed the Ukrainian border and updated it prior to publication.

The analysis also makes clear that NATO, while making significant steps toward addressing climate risk, remains under pressure to respond to extreme climate conditions and events that undermine operational readiness.

“It has taken some time for the security implications of climate change to find their way onto the NATO agenda,” Shea wrote, noting that alliance has been mired in conventional, cyber and hybrid attacks from the Middle East to Eastern Europe and now, “the implacable rise of China as a global military and technological power.”

Climate security also has tested NATO’s organizational norms, since the alliance is “used to reacting to—not anticipating—crises and to dealing with concrete and imminent challenges.” As such, “climate change may well have seemed difficult to assess.”

Erin Sikorsky, director of the Center for Climate & Security in Washington, said “NATO has been a leader in so far as pushing its members to put it on the agenda” and that allowing the Ukraine crisis to distract from those efforts would be unwise.

“Of course, climate isn’t the primary threat. It’s the interactivity with other types of threats,” Sikorsky said.

She also said that continued reliance on carbon-intensive resources such as oil and gas, particularly in Europe, “is propping up dictators like Putin who are taking advantage” and using export revenues to fund regional aggression and destabilization.

“This moment is so critical, and I think the stakes are too high not to address it,” she said.

Sikorsky noted that Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg has been an advocate of climate action. He was the first top NATO leader in decades to attend a United Nations climate summit when he appeared in Glasgow, Scotland, last November.

“Climate change is a crisis multiplier. It forces people to flee. It increases competition over scarce resources like water and land. It makes the world a more dangerous place,” he said in an interview with The Washington Post last year.

Reprinted from E&E News with permission from POLITICO, LLC. Copyright 2022. E&E News provides essential news for energy and environment professionals.

Daniel Cusick covers climate change adaptation and resilience. He joined E&E News in 2003 and has filed news stories from South Florida to Northern Minnesota. He has reported from more than a half dozen hurricane recovery zones and documented climate change impacts, resilience and energy transitions in East Africa. He lives in Minneapolis.

More by Daniel Cusick

E&E News provides essential energy and environment news for professionals.

More by E&E News

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe