New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

War May Have Stimulated Spread of AIDS Virus in Africa

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


In addition to the obvious destruction war can wreak, violent conflicts may lead to the spread of epidemic diseases, new research suggests. One of the viruses that causes AIDS, HIV-2, may have risen to epidemic status in West Africa as a result of an independence war fought under particularly unsterile conditions. A report describing the findings is published online this week by the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Previous research had identified two genetically distinct viruses, dubbed HIV-1 and HIV-2, that cause AIDS in humans. Both types were transmitted from simians (HIV-1 from chimpanzees and HIV-2 from sooty mangabeys) but they currently have very different distribution patterns among people. Whereas subtypes of HIV-1 are spread globally, those of HIV-2 are largely restricted to West Africa. Philippe Lemey of Katholieke Universiteit Leuven in Belgium and his colleagues analyzed historic and modern samples of HIV-2 from a rural population in Guinea-Bissau, as well as a SIV-SM strain from sooty mangabeys. (In the image above, a girl from Sierra Leone carries a pet sooty mangabey.) By comparing the different genomes, the team estimated the number of mutations in the sequences that had occurred over time and determined that the virus jumped from primates to humans twice, once around 1940 and again in 1945.

The researchers also ascertained that the incidence of infection with the subtype of HIV-2 that was first transmitted to humans in 1940 reached epidemic proportions between 1955 and 1970. This timing coincides with Guinea-Bissau's fight for independence from Portugal, which occurred between 1963 and 1974. In particular, they note that army-trained doctors launched a massive inoculation program in the region, and suggest that the difficulties of running such a campaign during war-time could have led to an increase in unsanitary injections that may have spread of the disease. Diagnosis of HIV-2 cases among Portugese war veterans also supports a hypothesis of increased sexual transmission of the disease during the war. The authors thus conclude that their work "strongly supports the major role of the independence war and associated changes in sociocultural patterns in the transition of HIV-2 from endemic to epidemic behavior."

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe