New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Waste CO2 Could Be Source of Extra Power

Dutch scientists have a use for all the carbon dioxide that pours from the chimneys of fossil fuel-burning power stations: Harvest it for even more electricity

LONDON – Power-generating stations worldwide release 12 billion tons of carbon dioxide every year as they burn coal, oil or natural gas; home and commercial heating plants release another 11 billion tons. A team of Dutch scientists has a use for it.

Power plants could, they argue, pump the carbon dioxide through water or other liquids and produce a flow of electrons – and therefore more electricity. 

This would be enough, they argue, to create 1,750 terawatt hours of extra electricity annually – about 400 times the output of the Hoover Dam in the Nevada – and all without adding an extra gasp of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. The exhaust from one cycle of electricity production could be used immediately to deliver another flow of power to the grid.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


They make the claim in the journal Environmental Science and Technology Letters, published by the American Chemical Society. The claim rests on a 200-year-old technique pioneered by Sir Humphry Davy and Michael Faraday: electrolysis.

Behind the reasoning is a simple proposition, namely that every chemical event involves some exchange of energy. In a solution, this movement of energy involves electrons, and ions that migrate to cation or anion electrodes. In a mix of two different solutions, the final mixture has an energy content lower than the sum of the two original solutions. But since energy cannot be created or destroyed, therefore there must be some energy available for exploitation.

Bert Hamelers of Wetsus, a Netherlands-based collaboration between companies and research institutes exploring water technology, and colleagues from Wageningen University report that they used porous electrodes and flushed carbon dioxide into water. They got a flow of current as the gas reacted with water to make carbonic acid, which in the electrolyte became positive hydrogen ions and negative ions of the bicarbonate HCO3. As the pH of the solution rose, the bicarbonate became a simple carbonate; the higher the CO2 pressure, the greater the increase of ions in the solution.

In their experiment, they found that as they flushed their aqueous electrolyte with air, and alternately with CO2, between their porous electrodes, a supply of electricity began to build up. Since the air that comes from the chimneys of fossil fuel-burning power stations contains up to 20 percent of CO2, even the emissions represent a potential for more power.

They found they could get even more power if instead of a water solution they used an electrolyte of monoethanolamine. In experiments, this delivered an energy density of 4.5 mW a square meter.

The irony is that this electrical energy is already potentially available at the top of the power station chimney, because on release one "solution" of greenhouse gas – in the stack's emissions – mixes with a different-strength solution – in the ambient air – all the time.

Nobody of course has a way of harvesting this power directly, but an old-fashioned experiment with electrodes in a laboratory shows that huge quantities of potential power are being lost every day, in unexpected ways.

It would require huge investment – and a great deal of engineering ingenuity – to turn greenhouse emissions into yet more electricity, but such research is a reminder that scientists everywhere are looking for clever new ways to power the planet.

***

Dan Li, a materials engineer at Monash University in Australia, reports in the journal Science that he and his team have developed a graphene-based super-capacitor that is compact, and can be recharged quickly, but can last as long as a conventional lead-acid battery.

That means it could be used to store renewable energy, power portable electronics or drive electric vehicles. Graphene is a new wonder material, a variant of graphite or carbon organized into layers just one atom thick. "It is almost at the stage of moving from the lab to commercial development," says Li.

***

And in the same journal, a team from the University of Colorado at Boulder in the United States report that they have a technique to concentrate sunlight and use it to split water into its components of hydrogen and oxygen: These two in combination provide the energy for hydrogen fuel cells that have already begun to power public transport in many cities.

The Boulder technique employs a towering array of mirrors focused on a single point to heat a metal oxide reactor to 1,350° Celsius (or 2,462º Fahrenheit, about the melting point of carbon steel) and set up a chain of atomic-scale events which grabs oxygen atoms from steam, releasing the hydrogen molecules.

"Splitting water with sunlight is the Holy Grail of a sustainable hydrogen economy," said Alan Weimer, leader of the Boulder research group. But commercial introduction could be years away. "With the price of natural gas so low, there is no incentive to burn clean energy."

This article originally appeared at The Daily Climate, the climate change news source published by Environmental Health Sciences, a nonprofit media company.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe