New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Watch Liquid-Based Magnet Droplets Twirl and Morph

Droplets filled with nanoparticles behave just like bar magnets

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The classic red-and-white horseshoe magnet may have worked for Wile E. Coyote, but it can be a little inflexible. Now researchers at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL) have created a more malleable tool: a miniscule liquid-based magnet made from nanoparticles.

Such flexible magnets could be useful in places where rigid ones cannot go, including soft robots or flexible electronics. And although they are not yet ready for practical applications, the liquid-based magnets reveal a new facet of nanoparticle behavior, which could pave the way for a novel range of magnetic materials, the researchers say.

To create the liquid-based magnets, researchers led by Thomas P. Russell, a polymer scientist at the University of Massachusetts Amherst and a visiting researcher at LBNL, started with a modified 3-D printer. First, they printed millimeter-sized droplets of liquid filled with magnetic nanoparticles. This liquid-particle mix is superparamagnetic—it is strongly attracted to a magnetic field, but as soon as the field disappears, so does the magnetism. In plain language, it is magnetic but not a magnet—a characteristic typical of fluids that can be magnetized, called ferrofluids.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Next, Xubo Liu, lead author of the new work and a researcher in Russell’s team at LBNL, added a surfactant to these droplets. A surfactant is a chemical that acts as an interface between oil and water. In this case, it drew the nanoparticles to the surface of each droplet so they formed a tightly packed shell around the liquid. Just like other ferrofluids, the encapsulated droplets were attracted to an external magnetic field. But the jam-packed shell brought out an unexpected new property: when Liu removed the magnetic field, the droplets held onto their magnetism. The process had made flexible, millimeter-wide permanent magnets, much like a classic bar or horseshoe magnet.

Floating in water, 12 tiny magnetic droplets spin in unison under the influence of a rotating magnetic field. Credit: Thomas P. Russell

“We almost couldn’t believe it,” Russell says. “People always assumed that permanent magnets could only be made from solids.” The discovery was published last week in Science.

Unlike traditional solid magnets, these droplets can change shape. For example, in the video below, a spherical droplet gets sucked into a narrow tube, which deforms it into a cylinder. Despite being squashed and stretched, the droplet remains magnetic.

A narrow tube sucks up a spherical droplet and then spits it out with a new cylindrical shape. Credit: Thomas P. Russell

The droplets can also be reset: when the researchers crank up the pH of the liquid in which they are floating, the nanoparticle shells loosen, and the droplets become round and lose their magnetism. But they will regain it if the pH is lowered, because that change will jam the nanoparticles back into a shell around each droplet.

In the video clip below, the researchers demonstrate that the jam-packed shell of nanoparticles—and not some other phenomenon—makes these droplets permanently magnetic. The beige droplets have a dense magnetic nanoparticle shell. The green ones have a loosely packed shell. The red blobs have a packed shell, but it is composed of nonmagnetic particles. The beige droplets react strongly to a spinning magnetic field—as a permanent magnet should—whereas the red and green droplets do not.

Droplets with a dense shell of magnetic nanoparticles (beige circles) spin in response to a magnetic field. The other droplets, which lack that packed magnetic shell, do not. Credit: Thomas P. Russell

“It’s not something I’ve seen before,” says Carlos Rinaldi, a professor of chemical engineering at the University of Florida, who also researches magnetic nanoparticles and was not involved in this study. “There is a whole field on soft magnetic matter, but I’ve never seen it done with droplets. I think they did it elegantly.”

Kelso Harper is an award-winning journalist and producer and former senior multimedia editor at Scientific American. They have a bachelor’s degree in chemistry from Johns Hopkins University and a master’s degree in science writing from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. They have also worked with Wired, Science, Popular Mechanics, and MIT News. Follow them on LinkedIn and Instagram.

More by Kelso Harper

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe