Watch the Human Brain Come to Life in This Stunning Piece of Art

Drawn and etched with algorithms, Greg Dunn’s masterpiece is unique in more ways than one

The entire Self Reflected microetching under violet and white light.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Sometimes neuroscientist Greg Dunn finds his field tedious. Working at a lab bench can make you forget how beautifully ornate the human brain is, he says. To reinspire himself, his colleagues and the public, Dunn makes art. Most recently he made an eight- by 11-foot gilded engraving of the human brain.

Titled “Self Reflected,” the piece maps Dunn’s illustrations of neurons and axons via algorithmically guided microetchings. As LEDs scan across the surface, they reflect off the varying depths and angles of the gold leaf grooves to make each neurological pathway shimmer like it is truly alive with electrical firings. The art is on display at The Franklin Institute in Philadelphia but videos like the one below are also on the project’s Web site. Watching the massive display composed of minute and intricate carvings is overwhelming—and that’s kind of the point, says Dunn, who received his neuroscience doctorate in 2011 but has dedicated his career to making art instead. “I wanted to use the power of art to communicate the complexity of the brain,” he says.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


To get his message across, Dunn first sketched out the clusters of neurons and the sweeping tails of axons according to descriptions given to him by other neurologists who specialize in the organization of different brain regions. His drawings, Dunn says, display the general layout of each lobe’s neurons—they are not based on any one person’s brain connectivity. The art became further randomized once Dunn handed the illustrations over to his algorithm. He wrote a code to sketch imitations of the overall structure of his drawings but instructed it to treat the neurons in each region as a giant connect the dots. Dunn could apply some parameters, such as how organized or random the path was, but otherwise left the computer free to design. Afterward another algorithm assessed each line for its distance from the LED lights. This code determined the angle and depth each groove would need to be struck to achieve different visual textures, such as the wavelike light reflection in the cerebellum or the more fractured displays of the frontal eye cortex. Dunn and his team printed the images onto transparencies they laid over a specific form of ultraviolet-sensitive polymer. In a process called photolithography, UV light etched the images into the underlying material.

Cerebellar folia - the laminar structure of the cerebellum, a region involved in movement and proprioception (calculating where your body is in space). Credit: Greg Dunn and Brian Edwards

Although Dunn says his art is not based on any one individual and relies on the random choices of a computer, the final product is far from generic. If he reran all the algorithms that comprise the final product, he explains, the tiniest details of the engraving would be different. Macroscopically, the image would be organized the same way but within each tiny cluster of neurons the algorithm would choose a new route. This is the same level of divergence that distinguishes one person’s brain from another’s, he explains. “The devil is most definitely in the details,” he adds. Dunn’s art, then, displays not only humanlike complexity, but humanlike uniqueness as well.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe