Watching Wrestling Linked to Violent Behavior

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Watching less television wrestling equals more harmonious dates, less violent behavior, less alcohol and drug use, and less drunk driving. That is the conclusion of a study conducted at Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center and presented at the American Academy of Pediatrics meeting in Baltimore on Saturday. To figure this out, the researchers watched an awful lot of wrestling themselves. They analyzed the World Wrestling Federation's "Raw Is War" and came up with some impressive numbers: 128 instances of simulated sexual activity; 608 fights with garbage cans, chairs, tables and brooms; 273 kicks to the groin; and a whopping 1,658 instances of crotch grabbing and pointing. It was not Mister Rogers' Neighborhood.

Next they asked a random sample of 2,228 North Carolina high school kids how much they had watched wrestling during the past two weeks and how frequently they had given in to various vices. It turned out that the teenagers who watched the most wrestling were more likely to fight on dates; act violently; carry knives, firearms or other weapons; use alcohol, chewing tobacco, marijuana or other drugs; and drive under the influence. "The bottom line is that we are affected by what we expose ourselves to," author Robert DuRant of Wake Forest says. "Wrestling doesn't in itself cause violence, but when combined with overall socialization, violence on television can affect what is perceived as socially acceptable behavior.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe