Water Activates Compound's Superconductivity

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Scientists are continuously on the lookout for new superconductors--materials that conduct electricity perfectly--in the hopes of finding ones that operate at ever-higher temperatures. The first substances found to facilitate resistance-free electron flow did so only at temperatures hovering around absolute zero. The subsequent discovery that certain copper oxide ceramics can superconduct at higher temperatures gave researchers a new avenue to explore. Ever since then, they've been investigating oxides containing metals similar to copper. Superconductive ones have proved elusive, however, until now. According to a report published today in Nature, it seems that some of these oxides should have come with the instructions "to make a superconductor, just add water."

Kazunori Takada of the National Institute for Materials Science in Ibaraki, Japan, and colleagues started with a compound comprising layers of cobalt oxide with sodium ions sandwiched between them. The team found that when water was added to the mix, the resulting thick layer of sodium ions and water molecules led to superconducting behavior. But although the superconducting properties of the watery cobalt oxide and copper oxide ceramics are quite similar, the temperature at which they perform the trick is not. Whereas copper oxide ceramics remain superconducting to temperatures in the tens of kelvins, the cobalt compound had a critical temperature of 5 kelvins. The scientists say they need further studies to determine the mechanism behind the newly discovered superconductivity, but they hope that the novel material represents a class of superconductors whose properties can be modified by changing the characteristics and spacing of their component layers.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe