Water in the Sea

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


On page 149 of the present volume of the SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, thore is a paragraph having the above caption, in which it is stated that " the water of our earth would form a globe of about sixty thousand miles in diameter." There is a mistake in the number, which should read, " about four hundred miles." If we allow the water on the globe to cover two-thirds of its surface, and suppose a general depth of about two hundred fathoms, it would give as the solid contents 33,513,246 cubic miles, from which data we calculate that this quantity of water can be contained in a sphere of the above diameter. There are many curious facts connected with the solid matter found in solution in the water of oceans and seas; for example, gold and silver are generally present in sea water, although in the most minute quantities, and in fact, traces of nearly every other metal have been found. This is accounted for by the supposition that many mineral veins must be exposed to the action of the water on the rocks which form its bed; and as there is an abundance of that universal decomposer, chlorine, it attacks and dissolves small quantities. We believe that Dr. Percy, the metallurgist, of England, was the first who demonstrated the presence of gold in sea-water. In regard to errors which from time to time creep, almost unawares, into the columns of every journal, we would state that they occasion us much annoyance, and we are glad to correct them. They seem almost unavoidable at times when the printer is clamorous for shorfitems to " fill up."

Scientific American Magazine Vol 13 Issue 21This article was published with the title “Water in the Sea” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 13 No. 21 (), p. 166
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican01301858-166b

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe