Water Meters for Boilers

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


In estimating the economy of any furnace, and the relative merits of various engines and boilers, sad mistakes are sometimes made, and the evaporator and consumer are mixed up in such a way that it becomes next to impossible to account for the steam which has been made. To remedy this, the American Railway Times suggests that a water meter be added to the boiler, and that the quantity of water which has gone into the boiler being thus accurately known, with little trouble and without any calculation, and the amount of steam consumed being measured by the indicator, the difference being known, would enable engineers to discover defects in their valvular arrangements of which they are now perfectly ignorant, and serve to show the working condition of the boiler. The indicator has done much for enabling the steam engine to be made more economical, and a water meter, simple, small and accurate, that could easily be applied to the feed pipe would be a valuable invention. This is certainly worth the attention of our inventors, and we would advise them to set their wits to work on the subject.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 13 Issue 49This article was published with the title “Water Meters for Boilers” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 13 No. 49 (), p. 387
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican08141858-387b

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe