Water Molecules March through Hydrophobic Nanotubes

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Given how prevalent water is here on earth, you might think scientists would have the substance all figured out. But it seems that at the molecular level, water still has some surprises in store. In a report published today in the journal Nature, researchers reveal new insight into the behavior of individual water molecules in close quarters.

The scientists designed a virtual carbon nanotube¿a miniature straw composed of carbon atoms¿with a diameter of a mere 8.1 angstroms. Using computer simulations, they investigated the effects of placing the tube in a pool of water. Because the carbon pipe is strongly hydrophobic, or water-fearing, the investigators did not expect water to enter the tube. Yet they observed spontaneous and continuous filling of the tube by an ordered chain of water molecules. The researchers report that, on average, 17 water molecules pass through the tube every nanosecond and that the watery chain is rarely broken. The impetus for this surprising behavior, they suggest, comes from a tight hydrogen-bonding network inside the tube, which allows density fluctuations in the surrounding solution to push the molecular water chain through the tube in bursts.

"We conclude that, counter to intuition, hydrophobic channels can have significant water occupancy despite a reduction in the number of hydrogen bonds compared to the bulk fluid," the authors write. According to study co-author Jayendran Rasaiah of the University of Maine, the findings have important implications for understanding the mechanism of water conduction through biological channels and membranes. The simulation, he says, provides dynamic information that goes beyond the static pictures of conventional structural biology.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe