Water through Lead Pipe

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


MESSRS EDITORS—I saw an extract recently, in a paper published in Manchester, N. H., respecting the deleterious effects of water running through lead pipe, upon fish-trout—causing their death. I would state that I have a hydraulic ram—one of J. ives & Co.'s—which throws water through a 100 feet of lead pipe into a reservoir, which contains about 50 hhds. The reservoir is made by scooping out a hole in the earth in a light sandy soil and plastering with several coatings of hydraulic cement, so as to forma thickness of 1 inches, which makes an excellent cistern. I put 13 trout into this reservoir last December, and : they all lived and were healthy until May last, when I built a small house over the reservoir, and plastered it with lime. When the doors of this house were closed, it was rendered nearly air-tight. I left home for about one week, during which period the reservoir was kept closed, and when I returned my trout were all dead. I attribute their death to the want of proper ventilation—the confined air being affected with the lime, which composed the plaster of the house walls. I have a large trout in a tub at my door—this tub is supplied with water through a lead pipe 50 yards long, and a number of my neighbors are supplied from the same fountain. I am satisfied, that no deletereous effects are produced by the water which runs through our lead pipe. I must say, however, that if the water is left some length of time standing motionless in the pipe it will be somewhat impregnated with the lead. R. P. Hyde Park, Vt. [We would state that water, containing some of the lime carbonates, is more sate than pure soft water for family use, if conducted through a lead pipe; the carbonate of lime unites with the lead and soon forms a crust in the inside of the pipe, which prevents the lead from affectingtthe water. Water, however, which is conveyed through a lead pipe should never be suffered to stand in it for any length of time ; at least we caution every person against the use of such water. When the water which is conveyed through a lead pipe has stood motionless in it tor some time, let it ail It. run off before the water is drawn for domestic use. Some of the physicians in I this city (New Yor.V) have published state-merits in our daily papers respecting the injurious effects of Crotoii water conducted through lead pipes. It is our opinion that if the water used in our city is allowed to llow constantly through a lead pipe, no injurious results need be anticipated.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 8 Issue 44This article was published with the title “Water through Lead Pipe” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 8 No. 44 (), p. 347
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican07161853-347a

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe