We All Speed-Read

The brain doesn’t sound out words it already knows, a new study shows

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

When children first learn to read, they painstakingly sound out every letter—C-A-T—before mentally stringing them together and connecting the result to a word and its meaning. With practice, however, we begin to recognize words on sight. In fact, our brain compiles a visual dictionary that is housed in the rear temporal lobe, adjacent to the area that recognizes faces, according to a new study published in Neuroimage. This dictionary eventually supersedes the responsibilities of the brain's phonics center, the researchers say, and is critical to becoming an advanced reader.

Laurie Glezer, a postdoctoral research fellow at San Diego State University, and her colleagues analyzed the brain activity of 27 participants—all native, monolingual English speakers reading at an advanced level—as they read homophones, words that sound alike but have a different meaning, such as “hair” and “hare.” They found that the homophones activated different groups of neurons in the rear temporal lobe—an observation that suggests separate visual “entries” for the words. The same group of neurons would have lit up if the brain was sounding the homophones out.

“From this work it looks as if there are regions that are separately computing these visual and phonological aspects that are both incredibly important for reading,” Glezer says.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The study's results could inform new teaching techniques. “In the debate about what's the best way to learn to read, there's this idea that phonics is the way to go,” says Maximilian Riesenhuber, who leads the Laboratory for Computational Cognitive Neuroscience at Georgetown University Medical Center and is a co-author of the paper. This study refutes that idea, he adds, because it shows that skilled readers build up a visual vocabulary that they tap into when viewing a familiar word as a whole.

Similarly, the research may offer insight into dyslexia, notes Fumiko Hoeft, a psychology professor at the University of California, San Francisco, who was not involved in the study. For instance, perhaps people with this reading disorder have problems developing or accessing the visual dictionary. At this point, however, it is “hard to say where the breakdown is,” Glezer says. She is now planning similar studies involving subjects who are dyslexic and others who are deaf—individuals who also tend to have trouble learning to read.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe