New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Weak Nerves May Cause Depression

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

In a painstaking experiment that may help revise our view of depression, a team at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine found that rats given Prozac did not merely experience a change in their brain chemistry but also grew new nerve fibers in mood-critical areas. This finding, which suggests that depression reflects problems of fine neural structure and not just chemistry (the prevailing model), should bolster the emerging “network hypothesis” of mood.

Over the past quarter of a century, it has become doctrine that depression is primarily a chemical issue. The prevailing model holds that depression occurs largely because shortages of the neurotransmitter serotonin in key synapses dampen mood-regulating neural signaling, opening the door to depression. But the recent results indicate that mood disorders stem at least partly from frail synaptic structures such as weak nerve endings and dead fibers, which cause signaling breakdowns.

Through intricate staining techniques, the Hopkins team found that rats treated with Prozac grew more axons —the neural branches that send messages —on serotonin-sensitive neurons in cortical and forebrain areas crucial to mood. Lijun Zhou, a researcher in neurosurgery, proposes that this local change is “the key structural effect of serotonin antidepressants” and may help explain some successful antidepressant therapy. The findings mesh with other recent human studies showing that both drug and talk therapy, when successful, raise levels of pervasive brain-growth chemicals called neurotrophins. Shortages of neurotrophins may contribute to the original structural weakening of neural-network circuits.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


“This is one of the first [studies] to report anatomical changes in response to drugs,” says University of Helsinki neuroscientist Eero Castrén, a specialist in neurotrophins and network theory. “It should help tell us where to look in humans for markers of similar change.” That, in turn, could produce a richer understanding of depression, as well as more possibilities for treatment.

SA Mind Vol 17 Issue 2This article was published with the title “Weak Nerves May Cause Depression” in SA Mind Vol. 17 No. 2 (), p. 6
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind0406-6

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe