Weakening HIV?

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The AIDS virus may have lost strength, at least in terms of how well it multiplies. Using HIV-1 from untreated patients, molecular virologists tested samples from 1986 to 1989 and from 2002 to 2003. After dosing human blood and immune cells with the viruses, they found the older HIV replicated significantly better than more recent samples and also appeared less sensitive to anti-HIV drugs. HIV-1, the most common strain of the virus worldwide, may be adapting to humans as it passes from person to person and becoming less efficient at multiplying to guarantee its continued survival in the host. The virus could fade into a nonlethal form “in 20, 200 or 2,000 years; there is no way to tell without further studies,” says Eric Arts of Case Western Reserve University, member of a team that includes researchers from the Institute of Tropical Medicine in Antwerp. The results appear in the October 14 AIDS.

Charles Q. Choi is a frequent contributor to Scientific American. His work has also appeared in The New York Times, Science, Nature, Wired, and LiveScience, among others. In his spare time, he has traveled to all seven continents.

More by Charles Q. Choi
Scientific American Magazine Vol 293 Issue 6This article was published with the title “Weakening HIV?” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 293 No. 6 (), p. 36
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1205-36b

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe