Wearable Liquid Crystal Sensors Detect Dangerous Chemicals

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Badges that change color or brightness upon detecting certain chemical compounds could one day warn people of hazards ranging from spoiled food to toxic nerve gas. According to a report in the current issue of the journal Science, researchers have developed wearable liquid crystal-based sensors that respond to parts-per-billion vapor concentrations within seconds.

Laboratories currently use techniques such as mass spectrometry to sniff out suspicious chemicals, but the equipment involved is bulky and expensive. In contrast, the new devices, engineered by Nicholas L. Abbott of the University of Wisconsin and Rahul R. Shah of the 3M corporation, are small enough to wear and would be relatively cheap to produce.

The sensor consists of an ultrathin gold film to which chemical receptors are attached. These receptors weakly anchor liquid crystal in a specific orientation along the film's corrugated surface. When the receptors are exposed to their target chemical, they bond more strongly to that chemical than to the liquid crystal. As a result, the chemical displaces the liquid crystal into a new orientation¿a shift that is visible to the naked eye. (Building multiple kinds of receptors into the sensor enables the detection of various chemicals.) When removed from the chemical, the sensor returns to its normal orientation.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


So far, the researchers have shown the sensors to be capable of detecting chemicals associated with food spoilage and certain kinds of pesticides. But they note that the devices could find military applications as well.

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she has focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe